Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Should Freedman get the sack?

+35
Alf Hooker
Sluffy
Tigermin
bwfc71
elhadj
JAH
NickFazer
Hipster_Nebula
Triumph
rammywhite
observer
Angry Dad
wanderlust
Banks of the Croal
Whitesince63
Boggersbelief
Soul Kitchen
Hip Priest
aaron_bwfc
MartinBWFC
Norpig
doffcocker
gloswhite
terenceanne
carrs
BoltonTillIDie
Culcheth_White
karlypants
CEF
luckyPeterpiper
boltonbonce
Reebok Trotter
Mr Magoo
Natasha Whittam
scottjames30
39 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 12 ... 22  Next

Reply to topic

Freedman

Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Vote_lcap21%Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Vote_rcap 21% [ 8 ]
Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Vote_lcap79%Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Vote_rcap 79% [ 30 ]
Total Votes : 38

Poll closed

Go down  Message [Page 3 of 22]

41Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 12:37 am

doffcocker

doffcocker
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

I don't understand forking out millions to bring in a manager (Freedman), then deciding he can only be a success if we make the worst manager in our history (Lee) his assistant.

42Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:11 am

luckyPeterpiper

luckyPeterpiper
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

BoltonTillIDie wrote:Dougie's contracted until 2015 isn't he?
Is he? I thought his deal was a rolling one and had to be renewed each year? If not then my bad but if he IS contracted to 2015 then sacking him now would cost even more money that we don't have. I think if we want rid it could be done this summer for much less and frankly with less than three and a half months of the season to go there's no chance anyone could take this bunch up anyhow. That said I would fully understand if he got sacked sooner BUT in my opinion Phil Gartside should join him on the jobless list. At some point Eddie really does have to step in and pull the trigger in the boardroom because it's there that most of this woeful situation has originated from.

43Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 2:01 am

MartinBWFC

MartinBWFC
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

aaron_bwfc wrote:Dougie would never allow Lawrence to go unless they both got sacked IMO.

However I do agree with you on giving Lee the assistant managers role, he is wasted at the club at the moment.
Ok scenario, Gartside tells Freedman he is sacking Lenny, Freedman spits his dummy, Gartside gives him an ultimatum. accept it or fuck off, Dougie either accepts or walk away with nowt, which option do you think he will chose?

44Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:27 am

Soul Kitchen

Soul Kitchen
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Natasha Whittam wrote:BTW, you twats had better not come poaching our manager when Freedman gets the push.

Why? Who  is it? Is he doing well?
Are Chorley a professional club?

45Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:37 am

Soul Kitchen

Soul Kitchen
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Reebok Trotter wrote:
Natasha Whittam wrote:
That's your answer to everything. You seem to think there's some unwritten rule that you can't ditch a club and support someone else.

These twats are taking the piss out of the fans. They don't care, so why should I?


How do you know they don't care? Ditching the club you have supported all your life just because the results aren't to your liking is a very simplistic view.
Didn't Michael Bolton do exactly the same in switching to Chelski?

46Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:39 am

Soul Kitchen

Soul Kitchen
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

doffcocker wrote:I don't understand forking out millions to bring in a manager (Freedman), then deciding he can only be a success if we make the worst manager in our history (Lee) his assistant.
Do you not remember Phil Neal?

47Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:50 am

Boggersbelief

Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Chris Coleman is 5/1 to be our next manager.

48Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 8:56 am

Soul Kitchen

Soul Kitchen
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Ffs if we are not careful we'll be bouncing about like a pinball. 
Can't see anyway Duggy will get potted to be honest.

49Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:18 am

gloswhite

gloswhite
Guðni Bergsson
Guðni Bergsson

Boggersbelief wrote:Chris Coleman is 5/1 to be our next manager.

If this is the case, I have mixed feelings, but one thing it does show, is that people are starting to recognise that he's on his way out.

50Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:28 am

aaron_bwfc

aaron_bwfc
Moderator
Moderator

I don't have this old line ''the players are not good enough'' bollocks, they were good enough last season when we almost got into the play-offs. Plus I don't put it all down to Dawson being here.

Sorry but he obviously can't get the best out of his players so it has to be Dougies fault.

51Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:35 am

Boggersbelief

Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

I like freedman but he's too stubborn. Continuously setting the team up completely wrong, if he accepts that the way he wants to play is wrong then he might save his job. 
Unfortunately he won't and it is only a matter of time before he is sacked.

52Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:50 am

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Forget the financial situation - the 7-1 thrashing had nothing to do with money and everything to do with Freedman.

We'd stumbled upon a reasonably successful formation and tactic by playing two upfront and actually attacking teams - but Dougie bottles it and reverts to strangling the opposition and giving them the possession.

I said all week he'd revert to type and he didn't let me down. He has an ego bigger than mine, he wants to prove "his way" will work when it quite clearly won't.

53Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:59 am

carrs


David Lee
David Lee

Natasha Whittam wrote:Forget the financial situation - the 7-1 thrashing had nothing to do with money and everything to do with Freedman.

We'd stumbled upon a reasonably successful formation and tactic by playing two upfront and actually attacking teams - but Dougie bottles it and reverts to strangling the opposition and giving them the possession.

I said all week he'd revert to type and he didn't let me down. He has an ego bigger than mine, he wants to prove "his way" will work when it quite clearly won't.

Dougie has no ego
Lennie has a hand inserted up his arse. You can see Lennie's lips move when DF speaks. The little boy can't think on his own and has to ask daddy before he can think on his own. The old man don't trust his little un that far yet

54Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 1:20 pm

doffcocker

doffcocker
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

If you type Dougie Freedman into Google News the second headline down reads:

"The waiting game: Bolton Wanderers boss Dougie Freedman happy to leave"

Then you click on it and it reads:

"The waiting game: Bolton Wanderers boss Dougie Freedman happy to leave transfers until frenzied last few days."

55Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 5:20 pm

Whitesince63


El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf

Lucky, I think you're confusing the ability of the players with their performances under Freedman's management. What it does without question prove to me is his ineptness, not just in making players better but in not making good players look worse. In all his time here, please tell me one player, young, old loanee, or existing that looks better now than when he came? Don't blame the players put the blame firmly where it lies with this absolute insult to management and our beloved club.



luckyPeterpiper wrote:
terenceanne wrote:If relegation is in your plans then keep Doog by all means.  Put a caretaker in charge till end of season or make a move for our next real manager. It will cost money .....but we will have to eat it.
Bring a guy in now so that he can judge the players.....don't wait until the season ends and whoever has no chance to evauluate.
terenceanne my personal feeling is this. Dougie has a contract that expires in the summer. Between now and then we should be taking a quiet look around at who else may be available then and if we find someone then by all means give them the nod as soon as DF's contract expires. I wouldn't complain if Dougie were sacked now but I feel it would be a waste of money that we don't really have if we put him on 'gardening leave' or paid him up while paying someone else to try and fix the existing mess with no resources and with those high earning bench warmers still in place. I am angry, truly furious at what happened today but the malaise in our club runs much deeper than this and the cause is much higher up the tree. For my money the first bullet fired should be into Phil Gartside's butt. 

The finances are so woeful that I doubt any really good manager would want this job and with the likes of Mears drawing more than twenty K a week to do nothing until the summer why would they? It's not as if anything can be done about the playing personnel any time soon and the sad truth is they aren't good enough no matter who's at the helm. Unless we offload a whole bunch of overpaid underperformers either on loan or by release then the manager has nothing to play with and no way to fix the long term screw up that this club has been allowed to become. 

Talent like Okocha and Gudjohnsen don't come here now; even the old stars like Djorkaeff can earn massive money either in America or China now and don't need to play in small towns in Northern England for one last payday. The best we can hope to be is like the White Hot years when we got the odd really promising kid and sold him on at a profit to a 'big club' later. But to do even that is harder now because the 'big clubs' are buying fourteen and fifteen year olds for a million quid or more just to lock up that young talent for themselves. The haves and Have nots get further apart every year and unless something radically changes in how football is governed and things like TV and sponsorship money is distributed that will only get worse. 

I know I sound very negative but this feels even gloomier than when we had 'Normid' in the car park. In fact I'd say the postion today is worse than that of the eighties, we weren't in a debt hole big enough to hide the US Navy in then. I don't just fear for our league position today, I fear for the very existence of the club in ten years time if not sooner.

56Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 6:25 pm

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Whitesince63 wrote:Lucky, I think you're confusing the ability of the players with their performances under Freedman's management. What it does without question prove to me is his ineptness, not just in making players better but in not making good players look worse. In all his time here, please tell me one player, young, old loanee, or existing that looks better now than when he came? Don't blame the players put the blame firmly where it lies with this absolute insult to management and our beloved club.


You don't blame the players at all? Have you watched the fucking highlights from yesterday? Regardless of the team and tactics players should be able to do the fucking basics.

I agree that Freedman should be sacked, but if you think a new man is going to come in and make these ponces title contenders you are dreaming. They have no fighting spirit, no pride, and way too much money. That won't change whoever comes in.

57Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:06 pm

Whitesince63


El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf

Natasha Whittam wrote:
Whitesince63 wrote:Lucky, I think you're confusing the ability of the players with their performances under Freedman's management. What it does without question prove to me is his ineptness, not just in making players better but in not making good players look worse. In all his time here, please tell me one player, young, old loanee, or existing that looks better now than when he came? Don't blame the players put the blame firmly where it lies with this absolute insult to management and our beloved club.


You don't blame the players at all? Have you watched the fucking highlights from yesterday? Regardless of the team and tactics players should be able to do the fucking basics.

I agree that Freedman should be sacked, but if you think a new man is going to come in and make these ponces title contenders you are dreaming. They have no fighting spirit, no pride, and way too much money. That won't change whoever comes in.


What I'm saying Nat is that the players have given up on Freedman. I just refuse to accept that they are as bad as they now look. Of course the players are to blame for their performance but when your hearts not in it you basically just don't give a shit.

58Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:15 pm

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Sick and tired of Freedman now. His post match comments are getting beyond a joke. The man would make a superb ventriloquist,due mainly to the fact that you'd never see his lips move on account of he's usually talking out of his arse. He'd also be spoilt for choice in the 'dummy' department.

59Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:17 pm

Reebok Trotter

Reebok Trotter
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

The same players that have given up on Dougie gave up on Coyle and Megson as well. We were told that Coyle had lost the dressing room. I'm not a player but I reckon I could find the dressing room.

The reality is that the players are just not good enough. Any hopes of promotion to the Premier League are delusional. We are not even a force in the Championship. We need to swallow our pride and accept the reality of our situation. The best manager in the World couldn't turn things round at the moment. Serious debt and a very limited  spending budget is hardly the formula for attracting a quality manager or quality players.

It is was it is.

60Should Freedman get the sack? - Page 3 Empty Re: Should Freedman get the sack? Sun Jan 19, 2014 11:26 pm

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Reebok Trotter wrote:The same players that have given up on Dougie gave up on Coyle and Megson as well. We were told that Coyle had lost the dressing room. I'm not a player but I reckon I could find the dressing room.

The reality is that the players are just not good enough. Any hopes of promotion to the Premier League are delusional. We are not even a force in the Championship. We need to swallow our pride and accept the reality of our situation. The best manager in the World couldn't turn things round at the moment. Serious debt and a very limited  spending budget is hardly the formula for attracting a quality manager or quality players.

It is was it is.
We don't need the best manager in the world. We need a manager who has some idea of what he's doing. Freedman is not that man. If he fell into a barrel of tits he'd come out sucking his thumb. Go now Dougie.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 3 of 22]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4 ... 12 ... 22  Next

Reply to topic

Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum