Thank God For The Tories

Natasha Whittam wrote:

doffcocker wrote:

I don't doubt Whittam Towers has been a happier household over the last five years, but the same can't be said for the millions that are worse off than they've ever been.

You fuckwit, I had to let my gardener go in these tough times.

Yes, many people are worse off including me.....but if Labour were still in power we'd all be a lot worse off.

wessy wrote:

Part of the problem in Industry is that many small firms are run by fools, what is you do Nat?

wessy wrote:
Your problem Natasha is you think everything is a piss take. Post a few cheap threads to  wind people up.
Being unemployed is a pretty serious situation, firstly the unemployment figures quoted do not reflect anything like the true figures probably another four million who are deemed as in a position to support themselves are not included.

People taking jobs on zero hour contracts, people working yet not receiving the minimum wage, people visiting food banks yet in work. If all this is part of this unelected toffs vision of the future then i say send them packing and soon.

As for Labour fucking up the economy? for me this is just another great ploy for the Tories to use in the "we are best on the economy debate" 

IF it was labours fault then why did America, Greece, Portugal etc all go bust ? maybe because it was a world wide banking crash. You just watch, if this rabble get another term they will eventually blame global problems, but just for now it suits them to blame all the worlds problems on the last Labour government.

AD as for not understanding the mindset of Labour voters, how do you explain the mindset of working people following the doctrine of the aristocracy. take  a look at why the Labour party was formed and take a look at the working conditions of children lrt alone adults prior to the birth of the labour movement and you will have your answer.

Part of the problem in Industry is that many small firms are run by fools, what is you do Nat?

wessy wrote:So your response is to say anything you do not agree with is ridiculous,(brilliant) then spout utter shite about war with who ever, and the cost of Haribo, you really are an utter shit at times. At least you accept that the crash wasn't down to labour, Nowhere did i say labour was great i never said that we would be driving around in Bentleys.

What i do say is that the unemployment figures are not a true reflection, this is common knowledge that the system used to collate the figures exempts at least 4-5 million people the government of the day usually tweaks the figure to suite.

What i di know is that througout my life time a Tory administration always leads to greater unemployment. Its obvious to normal people that it would suit the company owners to have several people chasing the same job, so that the lowest wage can be paid. Certainly happened under Thatcher. and it's happening now you just can't see the figures.

If you really do run a business i truly feel for the poor sods that have to dop a cap to you.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

wessy wrote:

Part of the problem in Industry is that many small firms are run by fools, what is you do Nat?

Do fools win "Preston Businesswoman of the Year" two years running?

wanderlust wrote:
Apparently so.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

wanderlust wrote:
Apparently so.

A touch of jealousy perhaps, just because you've never been Preston Businesswoman of the Year?

scottjames30 wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

wanderlust wrote:
Apparently so.

A touch of jealousy perhaps, just because you've never been Preston Businesswoman of the Year?

Congratulations on your award Nat, I believe you.  

Natasha Whittam wrote:

wanderlust wrote:
Apparently so.

A touch of jealousy perhaps, just because you've never been Preston Businesswoman of the Year?

Natasha Whittam wrote:

wessy wrote:So your response is to say anything you do not agree with is ridiculous,(brilliant) then spout utter shite about war with who ever, and the cost of Haribo, you really are an utter shit at times. At least you accept that the crash wasn't down to labour, Nowhere did i say labour was great i never said that we would be driving around in Bentleys.

What i do say is that the unemployment figures are not a true reflection, this is common knowledge that the system used to collate the figures exempts at least 4-5 million people the government of the day usually tweaks the figure to suite.

What i di know is that througout my life time a Tory administration always leads to greater unemployment. Its obvious to normal people that it would suit the company owners to have several people chasing the same job, so that the lowest wage can be paid. Certainly happened under Thatcher. and it's happening now you just can't see the figures.

If you really do run a business i truly feel for the poor sods that have to dop a cap to you.

You are seriously deluded.

So you think there are actually 8 million people unemployed? Do you also believe the moon is made of cheese and Doulas Freedman is an attacking manager?

The bullshit you spout is the same bullshit that's been spouted for generations by loyal Labour supporters who would vote Labour if Alex Ferguson was their leader and his main policy was to kill everyone who doesn't have blonde hair and blue eyes.

Open your eyes and vote for who you believe is the best party NOW, not 30 years ago.

You utter bellend.

1. Unemployment rate is six times higher than official figures | Mail Online
   [color:6b5d=rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.498039)]
   
   
   
   
   
   • www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-475517/Unemployment-rate-times-higher-official-figures.html+uk+unemployment+true+figures&tbo=1&sa=X&ei=nWkjU-aCC8nP0AXn7YDQBw&ved=0CC4QHzAA" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">
     

Natasha Whittam wrote:

wessy wrote:
Your problem Natasha is you think everything is a piss take. Post a few cheap threads to  wind people up.
Being unemployed is a pretty serious situation, firstly the unemployment figures quoted do not reflect anything like the true figures probably another four million who are deemed as in a position to support themselves are not included.

People taking jobs on zero hour contracts, people working yet not receiving the minimum wage, people visiting food banks yet in work. If all this is part of this unelected toffs vision of the future then i say send them packing and soon.

As for Labour fucking up the economy? for me this is just another great ploy for the Tories to use in the "we are best on the economy debate" 

IF it was labours fault then why did America, Greece, Portugal etc all go bust ? maybe because it was a world wide banking crash. You just watch, if this rabble get another term they will eventually blame global problems, but just for now it suits them to blame all the worlds problems on the last Labour government.

AD as for not understanding the mindset of Labour voters, how do you explain the mindset of working people following the doctrine of the aristocracy. take  a look at why the Labour party was formed and take a look at the working conditions of children lrt alone adults prior to the birth of the labour movement and you will have your answer.

Part of the problem in Industry is that many small firms are run by fools, what is you do Nat?

This is the most ridiculous post ever.

You seem to be saying Labour are great and if they'd stayed in power we'd all be driving round in gold plated Bentleys. How bloody deluded can you get.

The crash might not have been down to Labour, but it was them that allowed the banks to basically run the country. And when it happened, what was their solution - spend our way out of recession!

If Labour were still in power now we'd still be in recession, probably at war with Syria, Russia and North Korea, and a bag of Haribo would cost £20.

You utter bellend.

scottjames30 wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

wanderlust wrote:
Apparently so.

A touch of jealousy perhaps, just because you've never been Preston Businesswoman of the Year?

Congratulations on your award Nat, I believe you.