The bookies made us favourites to get battered by Watford. We have a manager who plays a system that requires different players that he hasn't got or won't risk yet. We are a mid-table side at best and everyone knows it.
So why the hysteria when we got battered as expected?
I guess people can get away with writing speculative nonsense on this forum as there appears to be some twisted logic at work by which hysteria is equated to being "passionate about the club".
Plus it's easy to go down the route of "Look at me! I hate Dougie more than you which obviously means I love BWFC more than you." in an environment where the greater the expression of disgust, the greater the (happy?) clapping of the sentiment.
But what I don't understand is this. Why is it that the posters who have spent all summer telling us how shit the team is and how inept the manager is are for the most part the same people who are doing most of the complaining now?
Surely they KNEW we were going to get battered by Watford and going off what they've written, surely they EXPECT us to get relegated?
So why the outrage if this was the level of performance they were expecting? Don't they believe what they themselves have written?
I expect us to finish mid table and anything better would be a bonus, so losing at Watford was disappointing but not a disaster and certainly not unexpected. But I'd have thought that those people who have written us off already (you know who you are!) would have fully expected this start to the season.
Can someone explain?
So why the hysteria when we got battered as expected?
I guess people can get away with writing speculative nonsense on this forum as there appears to be some twisted logic at work by which hysteria is equated to being "passionate about the club".
Plus it's easy to go down the route of "Look at me! I hate Dougie more than you which obviously means I love BWFC more than you." in an environment where the greater the expression of disgust, the greater the (happy?) clapping of the sentiment.
But what I don't understand is this. Why is it that the posters who have spent all summer telling us how shit the team is and how inept the manager is are for the most part the same people who are doing most of the complaining now?
Surely they KNEW we were going to get battered by Watford and going off what they've written, surely they EXPECT us to get relegated?
So why the outrage if this was the level of performance they were expecting? Don't they believe what they themselves have written?
I expect us to finish mid table and anything better would be a bonus, so losing at Watford was disappointing but not a disaster and certainly not unexpected. But I'd have thought that those people who have written us off already (you know who you are!) would have fully expected this start to the season.
Can someone explain?