Adam Johnson

Shameful stuff.

He lol's a lot doesn't he? Despicable bastard.

Natasha Whittam wrote:Another attempt by okocha to smear the Tory party. Shameful.

It's a factual news item similar to the one reported on the same day about Adam Johnson. One poster says they look alike. I agree.

 I have made no comment on the article. You seem touchy about it and have inferred more than was implied. 

(As an aside, and as you raise the subject, the Tory party don't need me or anyone else to smear them; they are managing that quite nicely on their own.)

BREAKING NEWS: Adam Johnson is set to sign for MUFC after hearing they have players who are Young, Blind and Keane.

Haha

"He has abused his revered position in society and... made a conscious decision to act in a way that he knew was both morally and legally wrong." - Prosecutor

He wants castrating when he comes out of prison.

I'm not sure he is a child monster tbh, probably went with a girl 15 but looked 18.

i wasn't sure at first but after reading about his texts and posts on social media he knew exactly how old she was so he only has himself to blame for throwing away his career

scottjames30 wrote:I'm not sure he is a child monster tbh, probably went with a girl 15 but looked 18.

Read the facts Scott, he knew exactly what he was doing. She told him she was in Year 10.

Bullshit, what facts are they? Link pease:.

Chances are she had already had sex with somebody from school or the local park or something. I mean it's probably not like he has stolen this girl's innocence. Yes the age of consent is there for good reason but was this girl ever likely to look back at some point in her life and think "if only I hadn't tugged that footballer off that time..."?
On that basis, I think to put him in the bracket of "child sex monster" is harsh even though by definition he has had sexual activity with a child.

He's just fucking stupid, and probably thought he could get away with it.

There are some troubling comments coming out on this thread.

The facts are:

He knowingly had a sexual encounter with a girl who was under the age of legal consent.

He initiated the sexual encounter, not her.

He "groomed" her by exploiting her idolisation of him.

He traded a signed football shirt for sexual favours.

He researched the legal age of consent online and then went ahead with his plan, despite knowing that he was committing a crime.

That is predatory behaviour and he is a paedophile.

We sneer at "under-developed cultures" where sex and marriage between older men and young girls are commonplace and praise our legal system and values for being superior.

Why?

Because they protect vulnerable children from people like Adam Johnson.

doffcocker wrote:Chances are she had already had sex with somebody from school or the local park or something. I mean it's probably not like he has stolen this girl's innocence.

You utter, utter bellend. What a ridiculous statement.

You should start a peedo sympathy thread with Hipster.

Get out of your flat Nat, you need mental help.

scottjames30 wrote:Get out of your flat Nat, you need mental help.

Apartment, not flat.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

doffcocker wrote:Chances are she had already had sex with somebody from school or the local park or something. I mean it's probably not like he has stolen this girl's innocence.

You utter, utter bellend. What a ridiculous statement.

You should start a peedo sympathy thread with Hipster.

I'm just pointing out that half the 15 year olds out there are sexually active. If this girl went home and told her mum she was ready to have sex with some spotty twat from her year, her mum would probably be supportive about it.

Am I saying we should therefore be supportive of a 28 year old taking advantage of a 15 year old? No. I'm just saying that it doesn't put him in the same bracket morally is every other child sex offender out there.

Breadman wrote:There are some troubling comments coming out on this thread.

The facts are:

He knowingly had a sexual encounter with a girl who was under the age of legal consent.

He initiated the sexual encounter, not her.

He "groomed" her by exploiting her idolisation of him.

He traded a signed football shirt for sexual favours.

He researched the legal age of consent online and then went ahead with his plan, despite knowing that he was committing a crime.

That is predatory behaviour and he is a paedophile.

We sneer at "under-developed cultures" where sex and marriage between older men and young girls are commonplace and praise our legal system and values for being superior.

Why?

Because they protect vulnerable children from people like Adam Johnson.

 Well said!

doffcocker wrote:
I'm just pointing out that half the 15 year olds out there are sexually active. If this girl went home and told her mum she was ready to have sex with some spotty twat from her year, her mum would probably be supportive about it.

I hope you don't believe that shite.

Doff, it doesn't matter what she did - it's all about Johnson and his actions.

We have the age of consent set at 16 for a reason.

I'm not naive enough to think that kids religiously wait until they're 16 to start banging each other because they probably never have and never will.

But we do need a legal cut off point where it becomes illegal for someone older to have sex with kids below that age.

Because whilst 15 year olds may think they know best, they don't - they're kids.

The law's there to protect stupid kids from being exploited.

Johnson knows this and ignored it.

He is a predatory paedophile however you spin it and whatever the girl may or may not have done is irrelevant.