Sluffy wrote:
I've no idea why he deleted his account
And therein lies the problem.......truly folks, it really does. Bigly.
Sluffy wrote:
I've no idea why he deleted his account
Have to agree, he did look lost.rammywhite wrote:boltonbonce wrote:Out of his depth.
I think your right BB. Its slowly dawning in him that he's put himself in the position of proving to be a catastrophic failure and a public one at that. I bet he's bricking it!
I don't think he'll last 4 years
gloswhite wrote:
There have been inept presidents in the past, (apparently), and they are shored up by their administration, and wives in some cases. (can't remember which one in particular I read about).
The problem with this 'support' is that non-elected people start making decisions for the country, with knock-on effects for the rest of us.
I think in most administrations many of the key decisions are taken if not by unelected bodies certainly with significant input from them.gloswhite wrote:Have to agree, he did look lost.rammywhite wrote:boltonbonce wrote:Out of his depth.
I think your right BB. Its slowly dawning in him that he's put himself in the position of proving to be a catastrophic failure and a public one at that. I bet he's bricking it!
I don't think he'll last 4 years
There have been inept presidents in the past, (apparently), and they are shored up by their administration, and wives in some cases. (can't remember which one in particular I read about).
The problem with this 'support' is that non-elected people start making decisions for the country, with knock-on effects for the rest of us.
gloswhite wrote:Nothing like Theresa May. She was elected by her government, which was elected by the country.
Two points:xmiles wrote:gloswhite wrote:Nothing like Theresa May. She was elected by her government, which was elected by the country.
Well 36.9% of those who bothered to vote anyway. Although they actually voted for a Tory party led by Cameron and presumably endorsing his policies not May's current policies.
gloswhite wrote:Two points:xmiles wrote:gloswhite wrote:Nothing like Theresa May. She was elected by her government, which was elected by the country.
Well 36.9% of those who bothered to vote anyway. Although they actually voted for a Tory party led by Cameron and presumably endorsing his policies not May's current policies.
1. Since when have we ever seen 100% turn out for any vote, anywhere.
2. Her current' 'policies' have really been dictated by the referendum, in large part. (I believe her actual policies will probably be far more beneficial than Cameron's would have been).
Regards Corbyn, he may give his lot free rein, but I doubt it. As somebody said earlier, it would be political suicide. Politicians are greedy and selfish, but rarely stupid, when it comes to their own survival.
xmiles wrote:Glos we are probably pretty much in the same area in our assessment of Corbyn. He is really far more interested in international matters and seldom has much to say about domestic matters such as the NHS where the Tories are vulnerable. I have no doubt he means well and is probably a very decent man but this does not necessarily equip you to lead a political party. Plus some of his policies are seriously impractical.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum