HomeWe need a Brexit style vote.
Bring Back Boggers
+10
scottjames30
Bwfc1958
whatsgoingon
Sluffy
karlypants
BoltonTillIDie
Norpig
boltonbonce
Bread2.0
Natasha Whittam
14 posters
Message [Page 2 of 6]
22 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:18
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Bread2.0 wrote:84-3 now.
They'll never get 445.
23 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:19
BoltonTillIDie
Nat Lofthouse
Posts : 13505
Join date : 2012-07-19
Age : 43
Location : Halifax
What's the point. If Brexit wins it will be because they are crayons munchers ha haboltonbonce wrote:We need a Brexit style vote.
24 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:19
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Hmm...My 2p worth...I feel that Scott has had multiple chances and got his Xmas amnesty that time he completely went nuts and all he posts is abuse.
Boggers on the other hand is different, I didn't mind him so much but at the time I had to ban both for the sake of the forum.
Boggers on the other hand is different, I didn't mind him so much but at the time I had to ban both for the sake of the forum.
25 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:20
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
This is a serious thread.BoltonTillIDie wrote:What's the point. If Brexit wins it will be because they are crayons munchers ha haboltonbonce wrote:We need a Brexit style vote.
26 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:23
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
karlypants wrote:
Boggers on the other hand is different, I didn't mind him so much but at the time I had to ban both for the sake of the forum.
Fair enough. Please unban him and give the guy a chance. You can always ban him again if he starts any bullery.
27 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:24
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
I demand a vote. The mods are out of control. 
28 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:27
Bread2.0
Andy Walker
Seriously for a sec, what did (the) Boggersbelief (character) actually contribute?
Spurious transfer rumours which never came to fruition and snide back-up for the other idiot when he tried stirring up shit.
And then there was the whole "not being man enough to pay up a charity bet" thing.
If that's what people want, fair enough but I honestly can't see how he's being missed.
Apart from by Whittam, who's clearly got an agenda here.
What am I missing?
Spurious transfer rumours which never came to fruition and snide back-up for the other idiot when he tried stirring up shit.
And then there was the whole "not being man enough to pay up a charity bet" thing.
If that's what people want, fair enough but I honestly can't see how he's being missed.
Apart from by Whittam, who's clearly got an agenda here.
What am I missing?
29 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:27
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Finally got commentary on chatbox.
30 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:30
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Sorry Boncey, I did mention that Radio Nuts is live in the match thread. 
31 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:30
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Bread2.0 wrote:Seriously for a sec, what did (the) Boggersbelief (character) actually contribute?
Spurious transfer rumours which never came to fruition and snide back-up for the other idiot when he tried stirring up shit.
And then there was the whole "not being man enough to pay up a charity bet" thing.
If that's what people want, fair enough but I honestly can't see how he's being missed.
Apart from by Whittam, who's clearly got an agenda here.
What am I missing?
There's no agenda. I just want more people posting.
32 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:36
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
You've not read this post correctly.Natasha Whittam wrote:Bread2.0 wrote:Seriously for a sec, what did (the) Boggersbelief (character) actually contribute?
Spurious transfer rumours which never came to fruition and snide back-up for the other idiot when he tried stirring up shit.
And then there was the whole "not being man enough to pay up a charity bet" thing.
If that's what people want, fair enough but I honestly can't see how he's being missed.
Apart from by Whittam, who's clearly got an agenda here.
What am I missing?
There's no agenda. I just want more people posting.
33 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:36
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
I had no audio for some reason.karlypants wrote:Sorry Boncey, I did mention that Radio Nuts is live in the match thread.
34 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:37
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Problem with your speakers?boltonbonce wrote:I had no audio for some reason.karlypants wrote:Sorry Boncey, I did mention that Radio Nuts is live in the match thread.
35 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:38
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
karlypants wrote:
You've not read this post correctly.
I have. He said I had an agenda. I said I didn't.
36 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:40
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
They weren't turned on.karlypants wrote:Problem with your speakers?boltonbonce wrote:I had no audio for some reason.karlypants wrote:Sorry Boncey, I did mention that Radio Nuts is live in the match thread.
37 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:42
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
I had flashbacks to our famous Mo for a minute then.boltonbonce wrote:They weren't turned on.karlypants wrote:Problem with your speakers?boltonbonce wrote:I had no audio for some reason.karlypants wrote:Sorry Boncey, I did mention that Radio Nuts is live in the match thread.
38 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:46
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
karlypants wrote:
I had flashbacks to our famous Mo for a minute then.
I'm not interested in your sexy dreams, just re-instate Boggers.
39 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 19:49
Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
We need a vote, a kind of Bogxit but in reverse. If we have a vote and he wins then fair enough
40 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:13
Sluffy
Admin
My view is different.
As far as I'm concerned it is all or non.
I can't see how it can be possibly deemed fair to ban posters simply to please other posters?
It takes two to tango.
I can't see how you can leave one person banned for good and allow another back for doing the same things at the same time - how can that be deemed fair and reasonable?
It can't.
Yes I know Scott had previous but the others involved were not whiter than white either.
All the people involved now know clearly that we no longer want the shit they gave us and will now act to stop it.
On that basis (and having previous discussion about my views behind the scenes) I believe the right thing to do is to lift the bans of both Boggers and Scott.
Future posts from and between Boggers, Scott and Bread will need to be civil in content otherwise all this shit starts again and quite frankly we've had enough of it.
On that basis I will lift the bans but if people still can't learn the lesson, then they will be gone for good just like the AD account.
As far as I'm concerned it is all or non.
I can't see how it can be possibly deemed fair to ban posters simply to please other posters?
It takes two to tango.
I can't see how you can leave one person banned for good and allow another back for doing the same things at the same time - how can that be deemed fair and reasonable?
It can't.
Yes I know Scott had previous but the others involved were not whiter than white either.
All the people involved now know clearly that we no longer want the shit they gave us and will now act to stop it.
On that basis (and having previous discussion about my views behind the scenes) I believe the right thing to do is to lift the bans of both Boggers and Scott.
Future posts from and between Boggers, Scott and Bread will need to be civil in content otherwise all this shit starts again and quite frankly we've had enough of it.
On that basis I will lift the bans but if people still can't learn the lesson, then they will be gone for good just like the AD account.
Message [Page 2 of 6]
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
|