HomeErrrr
Lard lad
Lard lad
Bring Back Boggers
+10
scottjames30
Bwfc1958
whatsgoingon
Sluffy
karlypants
BoltonTillIDie
Norpig
boltonbonce
Bread2.0
Natasha Whittam
14 posters
Message [Page 3 of 6]
42 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:22
Guest
Guest
You really have lost your edgeNatasha Whittam wrote:I'm not arguing that Boggers and Scott deserved their ban, and the loss of Scott will not hurt this site one bit.
But Boggers contributed in his own way. Yes, he was a bellend but most of us are guilty of that and have had our stupid moments.
When Boggers and Scott were banned there were several posters congratulating the mods for their actions, saying the site would be better off without them. So where are all the interesting or funny posts from these people now that the site is Boggers/Scott free? Who has stepped up now that Boggers can't take the piss?
I'll tell you, no one. I've just been away for a few days and each night I would check the site for something worth reading. Take away the news posts by KP or Sluffy and there was absolutely bugger all. I thought I was on the Mavies forum.
I may be wrong but I'd be surprised if the last fortnight hasn't been the quietest period in the history of Bolton Nuts. And it's only going to get worse.
Perhaps people need to accept that any forum needs an edge. A character or two who can set the site off with a couple of posts. Yes, they may overstep the mark from time to time but, as far as I am concerned, any forum is at its best when people are arguing over nothing.
Folk on here seem to like being shocked or outraged by certain posts or posters, but I'll bet you they really love reading the shite that gets posted on here. I know I do.
So I'm asking the mods to reinstate Boggers. Before more people drift away because no one is posting.
Many thanks.
Natasha Whittam (24,000+ posts)
This is embarrassing
Enjoy your retirement
43 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:27
Guest
Guest
Its not just a select few. Dont get me wrong, when boggers wasnt bogscott i actually found him alright. I liked him.Sluffy wrote:My view is different.
As far as I'm concerned it is all or non.
I can't see how it can be possibly deemed fair to ban posters simply to please other posters?
It takes two to tango.
I can't see how you can leave one person banned for good and allow another back for doing the same things at the same time - how can that be deemed fair and reasonable?
It can't.
Yes I know Scott had previous but the others involved were not whiter than white either.
All the people involved now know clearly that we no longer want the shit they gave us and will now act to stop it.
On that basis (and having previous discussion about my views behind the scenes) I believe the right thing to do is to lift the bans of both Boggers and Scott.
Future posts from and between Boggers, Scott and Bread will need to be civil in content otherwise all this shit starts again and quite frankly we've had enough of it.
On that basis I will lift the bans but if people still can't learn the lesson, then they will be gone for good just like the AD account.
But you cant ignore the majority.
Otherwise this place will be worse than it is at the moment.
44 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:28
Sluffy
Admin
y2johnny wrote:Errrr
Lard lad
Yes we know but he isn't posting abuse.
If he did he's banned again.
We can't stop people registering, they simply create a new email address and post via a proxy - but it takes them time to do so.
We on the other just need one click of the button to ban them.
Our job here as I see it is not to stop people from posting, quite the reverse actually, we WANT to see people posting and enjoying themselves and entertaining others.
The problem is that a very few people have to take things too far, or take the internet so seriously that they have their own personal vendettas that take over the forum at a cost to everybody else.
At the end of the day we are all grown men and women.
We aren't here to tell you what to do but we are here to try and stop people fucking the site up for the rest of us.
I think people have got the message now.
AD didn't learn, that's why he's no longer with us apart from the sad and pathetic attempts to keep posting on here every now and again.
45 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:30
Bread2.0
Andy Walker
Sluffy wrote:
Future posts from and between Boggers, Scott and Bread will need to be civil in content otherwise all this shit starts again and quite frankly we've had enough of it.
So obviously then, the logical thing to do is ignore all the evidence about how it all went disastrously wrong the last time you let Scott back and all the comments from regular contributors, applauding the recent bans?
Hmmm.....yes, makes perfect sense.
Not just all about keeping the numbers up though, is it?
46 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:31
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
y2johnny wrote:
You really have lost your edge
This is embarrassing
Enjoy your retirement
I'm not sure asking the mods to re-instate a poster is the place to be edgy.
47 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:32
Guest
Guest
Yeah.Natasha Whittam wrote:y2johnny wrote:
You really have lost your edge
This is embarrassing
Enjoy your retirement
I'm not sure asking the mods to re-instate a poster is the place to be edgy.
Good 'un
48 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:32
Sluffy
Admin
y2johnny wrote:Its not just a select few. Dont get me wrong, when boggers wasnt bogscott i actually found him alright. I liked him.Sluffy wrote:My view is different.
As far as I'm concerned it is all or non.
I can't see how it can be possibly deemed fair to ban posters simply to please other posters?
It takes two to tango.
I can't see how you can leave one person banned for good and allow another back for doing the same things at the same time - how can that be deemed fair and reasonable?
It can't.
Yes I know Scott had previous but the others involved were not whiter than white either.
All the people involved now know clearly that we no longer want the shit they gave us and will now act to stop it.
On that basis (and having previous discussion about my views behind the scenes) I believe the right thing to do is to lift the bans of both Boggers and Scott.
Future posts from and between Boggers, Scott and Bread will need to be civil in content otherwise all this shit starts again and quite frankly we've had enough of it.
On that basis I will lift the bans but if people still can't learn the lesson, then they will be gone for good just like the AD account.
But you cant ignore the majority.
Otherwise this place will be worse than it is at the moment.
I'm not sure what you are saying here Johnny?
If the same shit starts again then whoever is posting it will be gone - for good - or as good as we can make it - see my AD remarks above.
If they stay the right side of the lines from now on then why should the forum become worse than it is now?
49 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:33
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
y2johnny wrote:
Yeah.
Good 'un
Why are you pulling a strop, BoggScott didn't commit bullery against you.
50 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:34
Guest
Guest
Because quite honestly, a u-turn on the scott ban will just cause you more aggro sluffy. Honestly, not arsed either way, its not my forum, but it seems as though we are going the way of BA at the moment.
Have a pop in there, he is still spouting his bile. Even upto yesterday. Albeit he is at least getting better of not being too direct
Have a pop in there, he is still spouting his bile. Even upto yesterday. Albeit he is at least getting better of not being too direct
52 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:36
Guest
Guest
As already stated. I like boggers when not involved with scott. I honestly wouldnt mind if he came back. But for you to be the one campaigning........Well.Natasha Whittam wrote:y2johnny wrote:
Yeah.
Good 'un
Why are you pulling a strop, BoggScott didn't commit bullery against you.
53 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:37
Sluffy
Admin
Bread2.0 wrote:Sluffy wrote:
Future posts from and between Boggers, Scott and Bread will need to be civil in content otherwise all this shit starts again and quite frankly we've had enough of it.
So obviously then, the logical thing to do is ignore all the evidence about how it all went disastrously wrong the last time you let Scott back and all the comments from regular contributors, applauding the recent bans?
Hmmm.....yes, makes perfect sense.
Not just all about keeping the numbers up though, is it?
No it is about letting internet vendettas drop and moving on.
And for those who can't move on knowing that we will no longer tolerate their shit on here anymore.
54 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:41
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
y2johnny wrote:Because quite honestly, a u-turn on the scott ban will just cause you more aggro sluffy. Honestly, not arsed either way, its not my forum, but it seems as though we are going the way of BA at the moment.
Have a pop in there, he is still spouting his bile. Even upto yesterday. Albeit he is at least getting better of not being too direct
I agree with Johnny on this, I don't see why both of them have to be re-instated. They may have been guilty of the same "crime" but Scott has a lot more previous.
If two drivers are caught over the alcohol limit, one a first time offender and the other a 5 time offender they won't get the same sentence.
55 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:42
Guest
Guest
WTFNatasha Whittam wrote:y2johnny wrote:Because quite honestly, a u-turn on the scott ban will just cause you more aggro sluffy. Honestly, not arsed either way, its not my forum, but it seems as though we are going the way of BA at the moment.
Have a pop in there, he is still spouting his bile. Even upto yesterday. Albeit he is at least getting better of not being too direct
I agree with Johnny on this,
56 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:45
Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
it's like a banana republic on here, the Dictator has spoken 
57 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:45
Sluffy
Admin
y2johnny wrote:Because quite honestly, a u-turn on the scott ban will just cause you more aggro sluffy. Honestly, not arsed either way, its not my forum, but it seems as though we are going the way of BA at the moment.
Have a pop in there, he is still spouting his bile. Even upto yesterday. Albeit he is at least getting better of not being too direct
What happens on BA is their business not ours.
If Scott or anyone carries on an internet vendetta on here anymore then they can spend the rest of their life posting on BA for all I care because they will be gone from here for good.
What has anyone got to lose anyway - if people finally act their age then we can all have a laugh together - if they don't they get shown the door for good and people can tell me they told me so.
win - win surely?
58 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:48
Guest
Guest
Your not getting it sluffy. Sorry if im not making this clear. But scott has carried on his bullshit from here on BA so quite clearly hasnt learnt any lesson.
He has been banned multiple times for the SAME THING.
Hes probably been worse than angry dad.
Fuck it, id rather have angry dad back
He has been banned multiple times for the SAME THING.
Hes probably been worse than angry dad.
Fuck it, id rather have angry dad back
59 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:49
Bread2.0
Andy Walker
...and you seriously think those two will "act their age" and behave?
You've learnt fuck all during all this, haven't you?
Your site, your rules - Fair enough.
You've learnt fuck all during all this, haven't you?
Your site, your rules - Fair enough.
60 Re: Bring Back Boggers Tue Aug 30 2016, 20:52
Sluffy
Admin
Natasha Whittam wrote:y2johnny wrote:Because quite honestly, a u-turn on the scott ban will just cause you more aggro sluffy. Honestly, not arsed either way, its not my forum, but it seems as though we are going the way of BA at the moment.
Have a pop in there, he is still spouting his bile. Even upto yesterday. Albeit he is at least getting better of not being too direct
I agree with Johnny on this, I don't see why both of them have to be re-instated. They may have been guilty of the same "crime" but Scott has a lot more previous.
If two drivers are caught over the alcohol limit, one a first time offender and the other a 5 time offender they won't get the same sentence.
True but that is real life, this is the internet.
I hardly think words on a footy forum and driving a car under influence has the same severity as each other.
As I say above what have we got to lose in giving Scott the same chance as Boggers for doing exactly the same thing they were banned for?
If they all behave - great, if they don't they are gone and you can join the queue to say you told me so.
Where's the down side?
Message [Page 3 of 6]
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
|