I don't get 'Bake Off' (or most other programmes like these such as Strictly, I'm a Celebrity, Big Brother, The Voice - the list is endless actually), so moving from one channel to another wont bother me in the least but I know many it will!
£25 million a series to watch a bunch of middleclass, 'have everything's' - how many of these lot know how to live their life's and plan and budget their family meals on low incomes or having to go to food banks - marinating their quails in au jus and flambéing their soufflés?
It did interest me though what all the big fuss was about.
Apparently it is this -
"There are many reasons to love The Great British Bake Off, but if you're an advertiser it has something very few programmes can offer: Five million viewers under the age of 34.
For a programme aimed at a channel whose viewers have an average age of 62, and featuring a judge in her 80s, this is more than remarkable.
Bake Off was described as "quintessentially BBC" by the corporation and its formula, in which nice people cope with some mild pastry-related jeopardy, contradicts almost every expert opinion about what young people want to watch.
The BBC's other big ratings warhorse, Strictly Come Dancing, has a two-to-one split between those over and under 45. Bake Off is one-to-one.
Who would have dared say 10 years ago that the way to reach "Millennials" was baking?
So, it's no wonder that a rival broadcaster has swooped. That demographic is marketing catnip".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-37353262
So should the BBC have bid more to keep it (they bid just £15 million).
Should the owners of Bake Off remained loyal - after all it was the BBC that took the risk of building it up from a naff idea that nobody else would ever have gone with?
And will it effect you or your family's future viewing habits?
Fair play to Mel and Sue for telling the Bake Off owners to go stuff themselves after their treachery!
£25 million a series to watch a bunch of middleclass, 'have everything's' - how many of these lot know how to live their life's and plan and budget their family meals on low incomes or having to go to food banks - marinating their quails in au jus and flambéing their soufflés?
It did interest me though what all the big fuss was about.
Apparently it is this -
"There are many reasons to love The Great British Bake Off, but if you're an advertiser it has something very few programmes can offer: Five million viewers under the age of 34.
For a programme aimed at a channel whose viewers have an average age of 62, and featuring a judge in her 80s, this is more than remarkable.
Bake Off was described as "quintessentially BBC" by the corporation and its formula, in which nice people cope with some mild pastry-related jeopardy, contradicts almost every expert opinion about what young people want to watch.
The BBC's other big ratings warhorse, Strictly Come Dancing, has a two-to-one split between those over and under 45. Bake Off is one-to-one.
Who would have dared say 10 years ago that the way to reach "Millennials" was baking?
So, it's no wonder that a rival broadcaster has swooped. That demographic is marketing catnip".
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-37353262
So should the BBC have bid more to keep it (they bid just £15 million).
Should the owners of Bake Off remained loyal - after all it was the BBC that took the risk of building it up from a naff idea that nobody else would ever have gone with?
And will it effect you or your family's future viewing habits?
Fair play to Mel and Sue for telling the Bake Off owners to go stuff themselves after their treachery!