That is absolutely impossible to quantify, the amount of variables associated to it in terms of costs and benefits has so many second, third tier factors involved make it so.bwfc1874 wrote:Natasha Whittam wrote:bwfc1874 wrote:Seriously depressing watching question time last night. Yes it was in Boston, but the tone of the immigration debate has changed. Whereas before we saw politicians making the case for immigration (for which there is a strong one) it now seems to be regarded as political suicide to do so, the audience went wild at any suggestion that wasn't in line with - 'immigrants are to blame for all of our problems'.
Fair play to Corbyn for having principles and sticking to them, I fear the narrative in this country has already swung too far to the right though. With UKIP paling into insignificance the Tories could end up picking up those voters who see being tough on immigration the be all and end all.
So you're right and everyone else is wrong?
I think there are downsides but immigration has a net benefit to this country. Governments should do a lot more to help ease the burden of high immigration.
So yes I'm right.
It is easy to cherry pick facts and statistics to suit an argument, as per the famous quote "there are lies damned lies and statistics".
So no you are not "right" you just choose to select different "facts" to suit your argument than those people with opposing views choose to suit theirs.