HomeThat was years ago! I've been posting on there with full mod knowledge for the last two.
Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED
+11
Leeds_Trotter
Cajunboy
wanderlust
gloswhite
MartinBWFC
Ten Bobsworth
terenceanne
Natasha Whittam
Sluffy
Norpig
BoltonTillIDie
15 posters
Go to page : 
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Message [Page 8 of 9]
142 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 07:15
Kane57
Tony Kelly
Ten Bobsworth wrote:Are you ever truthful about anything, Manning? I have never had any difficulty with the administrators of any site but have kicked three into touch because I can't be bothered dealing with slimeballs like you.Kane57 wrote:He's certainly a character. Plus i believe this place is the last one before he's banned from everywhere.
We'll haveto see about this one but maybe a few Nutters are beginning to see you for what you are.
Every word I've said about you is true.
143 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 07:28
Ten Bobsworth
Frank Worthington
I think you have been exposed as a serial liar, Manning, who can never be relied upon to tell the truth about anything.Kane57 wrote:Ten Bobsworth wrote:Are you ever truthful about anything, Manning? I have never had any difficulty with the administrators of any site but have kicked three into touch because I can't be bothered dealing with slimeballs like you.Kane57 wrote:He's certainly a character. Plus i believe this place is the last one before he's banned from everywhere.
We'll haveto see about this one but maybe a few Nutters are beginning to see you for what you are.
Every word I've said about you is true.
Note for Sluffy. How long are you going to allow Manning to carry on like this?
144 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 08:08
gloswhite
Guðni Bergsson
10/-, were a pretty liberal lot on here, and as a result, we put up with lots of shenanigans, topics, and some pretty warped humour. One thing we are a little reluctant to do, well, most of us, is to call for someone being thrown out after such a short time. For many, like myself, we are not aware of what has gone on previously, and are quite happy to see what comes of your difference of opinions.
Asking when Kane is to be banned, is similar to a player waving his arms about, asking for another to be booked or sent off, and nobody likes that. (We'll give him a week or two
Asking when Kane is to be banned, is similar to a player waving his arms about, asking for another to be booked or sent off, and nobody likes that. (We'll give him a week or two
145 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 08:09
gloswhite
Guðni Bergsson
It missed my smiley
146 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 08:23
Kane57
Tony Kelly
Ten Bobsworth wrote:I think you have been exposed as a serial liar, Manning, who can never be relied upon to tell the truth about anything.Kane57 wrote:Ten Bobsworth wrote:Are you ever truthful about anything, Manning? I have never had any difficulty with the administrators of any site but have kicked three into touch because I can't be bothered dealing with slimeballs like you.Kane57 wrote:He's certainly a character. Plus i believe this place is the last one before he's banned from everywhere.
We'll haveto see about this one but maybe a few Nutters are beginning to see you for what you are.
Every word I've said about you is true.
Note for Sluffy. How long are you going to allow Manning to carry on like this?
Since 1st February 2013 if you must know, so about four and a half years
Last edited by Kane57 on Tue Aug 29 2017, 08:23; edited 1 time in total (Reason for editing : Ten Bob touches goats)
147 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 08:35
Ten Bobsworth
Frank Worthington
I'll tell you again what went on previously. I have had no exchanges whatsoever with Kane 57 until he started an unprovoked attack when I first posted on this site and it was only through comments made by Sluffy that I learned who Kane57 was.gloswhite wrote:10/-, were a pretty liberal lot on here, and as a result, we put up with lots of shenanigans, topics, and some pretty warped humour. One thing we are a little reluctant to do, well, most of us, is to call for someone being thrown out after such a short time. For many, like myself, we are not aware of what has gone on previously, and are quite happy to see what comes of your difference of opinions.
Asking when Kane is to be banned, is similar to a player waving his arms about, asking for another to be booked or sent off, and nobody likes that. (We'll give him a week or two
The history is that about fifteen months ago the BN published a ludicrous article in which the newspaper falsely claimed that the money the club got from the sale of Nicolas Anelka had not been reinvested. I challenged this and pointed out that it was just one of many published falsehoods by individuals intent on tarnishing the reputation of Eddie Davies. I referred to other examples including one made on the LOV site in which Chris Manning (I hadno idea who he was) falsely claimed that ED had pocketed c.£20million in player success fees. Manning has, of course, made further false and misleading claims about interest, all of it designed to malign Eddie Davies.
On this site, Manning has continued to make false claims about me and I think its past time you did something about it.
Btw I have posted a comment on the BN website this morning about the food and wine festival only to prove again how unreliable Manning is. Check it out. Feel free also to check out any website and ask whether I have ever been warned by them about anything I have posted.
148 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 08:44
Kane57
Tony Kelly
I really think you need to get out more.
Whether you change your username or not, Gary Ellis/Chris Custodiet, you were banned so the only falsehood here is the one you are telling yourself.
Go and get some fresh air whilst us big boys talk football
Whether you change your username or not, Gary Ellis/Chris Custodiet, you were banned so the only falsehood here is the one you are telling yourself.
Go and get some fresh air whilst us big boys talk football
149 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 09:11
Ten Bobsworth
Frank Worthington
Its time to leave the delusional, the daft and the deceitful to happily play amongst themselves. Adios
151 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 09:30
BoltonTillIDie
Nat Lofthouse
Ten Bobsworth - don't let Kane get his wish and drive you away from here.
152 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 09:37
Kane57
Tony Kelly
I have no interest in him leaving - I find him very entertaining. If he goes it's his own choice.
153 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 10:42
Sluffy
Admin
Ten Bobsworth wrote:I think you have been exposed as a serial liar, Manning, who can never be relied upon to tell the truth about anything.Kane57 wrote:Ten Bobsworth wrote:Are you ever truthful about anything, Manning? I have never had any difficulty with the administrators of any site but have kicked three into touch because I can't be bothered dealing with slimeballs like you.Kane57 wrote:He's certainly a character. Plus i believe this place is the last one before he's banned from everywhere.
We'll haveto see about this one but maybe a few Nutters are beginning to see you for what you are.
Every word I've said about you is true.
Note for Sluffy. How long are you going to allow Manning to carry on like this?
I think Glos and BTID have already answered you before I read your message.
In the whole history of Nuts we've only permanently excluded two members (apart from spam accounts) which kind of shows that we are about as tolerant of everyone as we can - which allows a fair and frank exchange of views and hopefully prevents any 'clique' developing of how we must think and act, with anyone not doing so being excluded.
Maybe this 'openness' might scare off the most timid of posters but I don't doubt for one second that you are that type and can easily deal with others on an internet forum.
I for one wouldn't wish you to leave but won't be banning Mr Manning solely so you will stay.
Chris himself says in the post above that he wants you to remain.
You've entertained and informed us royally in your brief stay so far - and you may or may not have gathered that Mr Manning is not universally loved by everyone on here (I'm probably his biggest fan by far on Nuts - I think many having similar (but less extreme) views of him as you!).
I don't know who you are (apart from the name Chris has stated) and frankly I don't care. I've no interest in what's gone on between you both prior to Nuts and have asked you both to leave your previous baggage with each other at the Nuts front door when entering here - and requested that you are civil to each other whilst posting.
It would make Nuts that much poorer for us all if you did choose to go but I send my best wishes and good luck to you if you do decide to leave us.
Very much hope you don't though!
154 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 10:47
Ten Bobsworth
Frank Worthington
I'm sorry Sluffy but I want nothing to do with, Manning (or anyone of his ilk), so I have no choice. I sent a request for the closure of my account an hour or so ago.
155 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 10:57
wanderlust
Nat Lofthouse
Posts : 22910
Join date : 2012-01-12
I believe the turnover threshhold for small business eligibility has risen to over £10 million these days so apologies - there is indeed no requirement to publish if the loan (in) and subsequent payment (out) were the only transactions so if I understand this right I suppose we can't really expect to see any more which is a shame as publication would have put an end to the speculation which seems to be causing issues on here and elsewhere.Ten Bobsworth wrote:Its not the shares I'm talking about. They only cost ten bob. Its the £5million BluMarble loan that's missing and the £4million loan to the club that was paid out of it. Both were outstanding then and still are. That's why the case was in court this weekwanderlust wrote:Apologies. In that case I'm stumped because Deano borrowed the money and bought club shares in February 2016 (approx) so the only thing I can think of is that by the end of the year the shares etc had been shifted into another entity - leaving a zero balance.Ten Bobsworth wrote:Sorry old pal, but the balance sheet is, in this case, a statement of the position of the company at 31 December 2016. Btw I am now well into my fifth decade as a qualified chartered accountantwanderlust wrote:Because it's a balance sheet i.e. a snapshot of the value of the club at a particular point in time.Ten Bobsworth wrote:I hope members will forgive me for not commenting previously on the SportsShield BWFC Ltd (dormant?) balance sheet.
Accepting that the ten bob invested in Burnden Leisure is too small to register, where is:
1.The loan from BluMarble
2.The loan to BWFC
3. The interest and charges both ways
How can it be dormant when it has bought shares and both borrowed and loaned money? Or have these transactions been recorded in some other name?
This balance sheet was obviously produced after the shares and other assets were disposed of presumably to the liquidators - like a final bank statement after you've closed the account.
Now if you want the story of the ins and outs and what went on over e.g. the last year, you'll be needing a P & L and the previous financial statements to compare against.
To check this we'd still need a P&L/CFF for the period as you know. Would that be now available at Companies' House? It would be a damned sight more useful to get an insight into what happened than the published Balance Sheet.
Small companies btw are not required to publish P&L accounts and even balance sheet info is limited to basics.
Ken filed a dormant balance sheet too. I don't think that was technically correct but not much happened in that company other than the ten bob investment so I wouldn't lose much sleep over that one.
Whatever the situation, I still think that despite the liquidator having a responsibility to get the highest possible price for the shares in order to maximise payment to the creditors (BM) the fact that club assets were used as collateral worries me as it provides an easy option if buyers for the shares aren't going to come up with the full whack.
Given KAs aggressive move on Deano last year (taking shares in lieu of further investment that Deano couldn't come up with) it wouldn't surprise me if KA tried to buy the shares himself to further consolidate his control of the club.
156 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 11:00
Leeds_Trotter
El Hadji Diouf
I dislike Manning too, but I won't leave just because he's on here. We are all adults at the end of the day, we can all post on here despite our difference of opinions. That is what a forum is for after all.
157 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 11:01
Guest
Guest
Hes obviously a wetwipe.Leeds_Trotter wrote:I dislike Manning too, but I won't leave just because he's on here. We are all adults at the end of the day, we can all post on here despite our difference of opinions. That is what a forum is for after all.
158 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 11:01
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Ten Bobsworth wrote:I'm sorry Sluffy but I want nothing to do with, Manning (or anyone of his ilk), so I have no choice. I sent a request for the closure of my account an hour or so ago.
Ha ha, it's not Netflix or British Gas.
159 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 11:01
Guest
Guest
Natasha Whittam wrote:Ten Bobsworth wrote:I'm sorry Sluffy but I want nothing to do with, Manning (or anyone of his ilk), so I have no choice. I sent a request for the closure of my account an hour or so ago.
Ha ha, it's not Netflix or British Gas.
160 Re: Sports Shield BWFC Ltd - LIQUIDATED Tue Aug 29 2017, 11:03
Kane57
Tony Kelly
Leeds_Trotter wrote:I dislike Manning too, but I won't leave just because he's on here. We are all adults at the end of the day, we can all post on here despite our difference of opinions. That is what a forum is for after all.
I don't think I've ever spoke to you
Message [Page 8 of 9]
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You can reply to topics in this forum
|
|
|