Deleted
Last edited by okocha on Sat Feb 29 2020, 11:13; edited 1 time in total
Last edited by okocha on Sat Feb 29 2020, 11:13; edited 1 time in total
I wouldn't say it's an extreme view TROY - more a perfectly valid question which deserves a competent answer. The woman clearly doesn't understand that immigration is the cornerstone of Britain's development (as we're all descended from immigrants) that it brings in more income than all the costs she is referring to and that the very services she is referring to wouldn't exist if it was not for foreign workers. I didn't watch the programme but I hope that someone has the sense to educate her.T.R.O.Y wrote:It’s a national embarrassment that views such as this have been fuelled by media spin and right wing lies, it should have been nipped in the bud years ago but it suited the governing party to push blame onto migration and the EU / completely disassociate austerity with having any negative consequences.
https://twitter.com/bbcquestiontime/status/1230625055803133953?s=21
Extreme views like this need to be exposed, questioned and debunked. We have done a shit job in doing that for years now.
T.R.O.Y wrote:It’s a national embarrassment that views such as this have been fuelled by media spin and right wing lies, it should have been nipped in the bud years ago but it suited the governing party to push blame onto migration and the EU / completely disassociate austerity with having any negative consequences.
https://twitter.com/bbcquestiontime/status/1230625055803133953?s=21
Extreme views like this need to be exposed, questioned and debunked. We have done a shit job in doing that for years now.
xmiles wrote:Apparently Britain doesn't need farmers or a fishing industry according to one of Boris' top advisers. Is that what you brexiteers voted for?
"In leaked emails obtained by The Mail on Sunday, powerful Treasury adviser Tim Leunig argues that the food sector is not 'critically important' to the economy - and that agriculture and fishery production 'certainly isn't'. In his astonishing remarks - which comes as the UK prepares to enter crunch post-Brexit trade talks with Donald Trump - Dr Leunig implies that the UK could follow the example of Singapore 'which is rich without having its own agricultural sector'. Dr Leunig is a long-standing colleague of Boris Johnson's No 10 enforcer Dominic Cummings, and his intervention exemplifies the radical thinking within Boris Johnson's inner circle against bastions of the Establishment such as the Civil Service and the BBC."
That should make the negotiations easier but it is hardly taking back control is it?
Natasha Whittam wrote:xmiles wrote:Apparently Britain doesn't need farmers or a fishing industry according to one of Boris' top advisers. Is that what you brexiteers voted for?
"In leaked emails obtained by The Mail on Sunday, powerful Treasury adviser Tim Leunig argues that the food sector is not 'critically important' to the economy - and that agriculture and fishery production 'certainly isn't'. In his astonishing remarks - which comes as the UK prepares to enter crunch post-Brexit trade talks with Donald Trump - Dr Leunig implies that the UK could follow the example of Singapore 'which is rich without having its own agricultural sector'. Dr Leunig is a long-standing colleague of Boris Johnson's No 10 enforcer Dominic Cummings, and his intervention exemplifies the radical thinking within Boris Johnson's inner circle against bastions of the Establishment such as the Civil Service and the BBC."
That should make the negotiations easier but it is hardly taking back control is it?
Desperate post.
Natasha Whittam wrote:You're quoting a newspaper.
He was a trouble maker he had to go and she gets things done, she will be pm one day.okocha wrote:A damning indictment of our increasingly despotic government:
The top civil servant in the Home Office has resigned and said he intends to sue the government for constructive dismissal.
Sir Philip Rutnam said there had been a "vicious and orchestrated" campaign against him in Home Secretary Priti Patel's office.
Sir Philip, who has had a career spanning 33 years, said he believed his experience was "extreme" but part of a "wider pattern" in government
Comment by a reporter on the Sophie Ridge show was that some people think he was no longer up to the job, (presumably coping with the change of pace and ways of working).Angry Dad wrote:He was a trouble maker he had to go and she gets things done, she will be pm one day.okocha wrote:A damning indictment of our increasingly despotic government:
The top civil servant in the Home Office has resigned and said he intends to sue the government for constructive dismissal.
Sir Philip Rutnam said there had been a "vicious and orchestrated" campaign against him in Home Secretary Priti Patel's office.
Sir Philip, who has had a career spanning 33 years, said he believed his experience was "extreme" but part of a "wider pattern" in government
gloswhite wrote:Comment by a reporter on the Sophie Ridge show was that some people think he was no longer up to the job, (presumably coping with the change of pace and ways of working).Angry Dad wrote:He was a trouble maker he had to go and she gets things done, she will be pm one day.okocha wrote:A damning indictment of our increasingly despotic government:
The top civil servant in the Home Office has resigned and said he intends to sue the government for constructive dismissal.
Sir Philip Rutnam said there had been a "vicious and orchestrated" campaign against him in Home Secretary Priti Patel's office.
Sir Philip, who has had a career spanning 33 years, said he believed his experience was "extreme" but part of a "wider pattern" in government
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum