This explains it very wellgloswhite wrote:Just who are these 'Gammons' ?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/gammon-left-wing-political-insult-twitter-racism-debate-right-charles-dickens-a8352281.html
This explains it very wellgloswhite wrote:Just who are these 'Gammons' ?
Thank you Mr. Pig. I think its a silly name to use, and am surprised at how supposedly intelligent people actually get involved in deep and meaningful discussions about it.Norpig wrote:
This explains it very well
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/gammon-left-wing-political-insult-twitter-racism-debate-right-charles-dickens-a8352281.html
Glos, I think you'll prefer this much more humorous definition of Gammon:gloswhite wrote:
Thank you Mr. Pig. I think its a silly name to use, and am surprised at how supposedly intelligent people actually get involved in deep and meaningful discussions about it.
It just goes to show, that after 3 years of intense insults, etc, this is all the Left could come up with. No wonder they lost the argument.
okocha wrote:
Glos, I think you'll prefer this much more humorous definition of Gammon:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Gammon
okocha wrote:
Glos, I think you'll prefer this much more humorous definition of Gammon:
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Gammon
It's all a complete waste of time. Can you imagine a Sluffy tweet? He'd run out of characters before he'd even got going.gloswhite wrote:Unfortunately, we are now a society that spends most free time sat on PC's, laptops, etc, and once on them, we find we have a lot of time to do very little. As a result they complain, whinge, and throw their comments about as though they really do have a say in whatever they are commenting on. Frustration soon sets in when they realise that they, and their comments, are such a small cog in life's works that they can do nothing but lash out. We really have become a nation, no doubt along with many others of a deeply frustrated and unhappy people. Makes me wonder if the social media in its current set-up and management, which everyone defends, is ultimately beneficial to us all.
Probably have his account locked I don't have a Twitter account. I can't be arsed being harangued on more than one platform.boltonbonce wrote:
It's all a complete waste of time. Can you imagine a Sluffy tweet? He'd run out of characters before he'd even got going.
Natasha Whittam wrote:Ha ha, absolutely laughable that people want a set of Covid rules set in stone.
This is a new pandemic. No one has been through it before. Yet if the government had published a set of rules in March and had stuck to them for 6 months people would be going bonkers, saying they need to be more flexible.
wanderlust wrote:I think that the fact that it is a new pandemic and we have no experience of it is all the more reason why we should have had a clear and moreover enforceable set of laws from the get go.
Sure some folk would whinge but at least there wouldn't have been anywhere the number of deaths we've had to endure so f*** 'em or at least bang 'em up for attempted murder or whatever intentionally spreading the disease is seen as.
I recall folk have been banged up for intentionally spreading AIDS so I fail to see how killing your granny is any different.
They wouldn't whinge so much if disobeying the rules was widely perceived as murder.
Unfortunately the Government prevaricated so much at the outset that in the absence of enforceable laws, disobeying the "guidelines" are now seen as an infringement of personal freedoms by some dickheads who don't care if the vulnerable live or die.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum