T.R.O.Y. wrote: Sluffy wrote:
Instead of saying something like 'sorry, hadn't realised I had, I thought you had mentioned it before, my mistake' or something/anything along those lines
That’s exactly what I did, see post 568.
Sluffy wrote:
First I told you straight, I then had to spell it out for you, then at the third time I need to end it - which I did.
So three times you had to tell me, yet I didn’t post any of your personal information after being told once.
So what exactly is it you ended?
Time line for you
Post 557 - you disclose personal information about me
Post 558 - I tell you do that again and you're gone for good
Post 559 - you tell me that I had already made that info public
Post 560 -
I tell you specifically I have never disclosed such info publiclyPost 561 - you again tell me I had already made in public
Post 563 -
I tell you for the second time I have never disclosed such info publiclyPost 564 - you tell me I post stuff about Wanderlust and I'm a hypocrite
Post 565 -
I tell you for the third time that I have never disclosed such info about me publicly and anything I've mention about Wanderlust he had already himself put into the public domain. I triggered your ban accordingly
Post 568 - On your return from your ban you finally accept you had posted personal info about me that wasn't in the public domain, apologise, then go on to tell me my action to ban you wasn't justified and that I'm childish and/or angry when dealing with you.
Post 570 - I explained what I did and why I did so and that accordingly you brought the ban upon yourself.
Post 571 - You state that my explanation would only make sense if you had posted the personal information three times - and that you had not done. You went on to accuse me of being aggressive and my behaviour was ridiculous coming from an adult.
Post 572 -
I again explained my actions - and stated yet again that I had to tell you three times that you had posted personal information about me that wasn't in the public domain and NOT that you had three times posted this information.
Post 573 - You state you did apologise (see post 568) but neglect to accept that you only did so after I had triggered your ban - see posts from 557 to 565 above - but yet still continue to contrive the argument further!
Post 575 - this one - giving the timeline of events and triggering a further 24 hour ban as you clearly don't want to let this matter end.
Peter, apologies, believe me, I get just as sick and tired as you and everyone else does about stuff like this, too.
Hopefully this further ban will spell an end to it.
Home
