Hi everybody. Let me ask a question. Was Coyle all that bad? Really?
To some the answer is a resounding yes! But I know things are not always so straight forward...
There are a few angles to approach this from. And non of them are intended to give a pro-Coyle spin on things.
So we got relegated. We all assumed that the players we had would prosper after the drop and some even thought we would storm the league. Gartside thought we would go straight back up. Coyle thought we would. 90% of the supporters thought that the team we had going into the season was good enough to win promotion. Even the bookies thought that Bolton had it in them to win the league.
But here we find ourselves a couple of months into the season - hovering precariously at the wrong end of the division. At the start of the season it was put down to a relegation hangover or taking time to adjust to the pace of the Championship. Then it was put down to Coyle being unable to organise the team or set them up properly to win games.
It was always claimed that Bolton had a strong enough squad, good enough players, and plenty of depth and resources. It must be Coyle doing something wrong!
But LSL and JP plus DF have managed 8 games between them and mustered 11 points from a possible 24. All the while they supposedly had a good enough squad to compete for the title, indeed "walk it" in some people's opinion.
But as the games have passed and points have continued to slip away the opinions have started to change. Suddenly "Freedman can't be expected to do anything until he can bring in his own players" and "we can't get the results, regardless of tactics with the bunch of useless players Coyle has left us with".
But hang on a minute! I thought the players were good enough and Coyle's tactics were to blame! So which is it? Both. Ok fine. But if the players we are left with are really not up to scratch then we ALL made the same mistake that Coyle did!
Everybody thought that the squad Coyle had ready for the start of the season was good enough! Pretty much every Bolton fan I know was enthusiastic about our chances. People said our defence was pretty solid with the likes of Knight and Ricketts and Alonso and Ream etc. We thought our midfield would rule the league with Eagles and Lee, Petrov, Mavies, etc. We assumed that Kevin Davies would enjoy greater success as would Ngog and Sordell.
Coyle simply made the same error as the rest of us. He thought that that group of players could do it - but they proved they could not. Can you blame him for thinking those players were good enough?
To some the answer is a resounding yes! But I know things are not always so straight forward...
There are a few angles to approach this from. And non of them are intended to give a pro-Coyle spin on things.
So we got relegated. We all assumed that the players we had would prosper after the drop and some even thought we would storm the league. Gartside thought we would go straight back up. Coyle thought we would. 90% of the supporters thought that the team we had going into the season was good enough to win promotion. Even the bookies thought that Bolton had it in them to win the league.
But here we find ourselves a couple of months into the season - hovering precariously at the wrong end of the division. At the start of the season it was put down to a relegation hangover or taking time to adjust to the pace of the Championship. Then it was put down to Coyle being unable to organise the team or set them up properly to win games.
It was always claimed that Bolton had a strong enough squad, good enough players, and plenty of depth and resources. It must be Coyle doing something wrong!
But LSL and JP plus DF have managed 8 games between them and mustered 11 points from a possible 24. All the while they supposedly had a good enough squad to compete for the title, indeed "walk it" in some people's opinion.
But as the games have passed and points have continued to slip away the opinions have started to change. Suddenly "Freedman can't be expected to do anything until he can bring in his own players" and "we can't get the results, regardless of tactics with the bunch of useless players Coyle has left us with".
But hang on a minute! I thought the players were good enough and Coyle's tactics were to blame! So which is it? Both. Ok fine. But if the players we are left with are really not up to scratch then we ALL made the same mistake that Coyle did!
Everybody thought that the squad Coyle had ready for the start of the season was good enough! Pretty much every Bolton fan I know was enthusiastic about our chances. People said our defence was pretty solid with the likes of Knight and Ricketts and Alonso and Ream etc. We thought our midfield would rule the league with Eagles and Lee, Petrov, Mavies, etc. We assumed that Kevin Davies would enjoy greater success as would Ngog and Sordell.
Coyle simply made the same error as the rest of us. He thought that that group of players could do it - but they proved they could not. Can you blame him for thinking those players were good enough?