Vagitarian Rights?

Angry Dad wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:

Angry Dad wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Angry Dad wrote:Good for him i wouldn't either only perfectly respectable fair haired blue eye'd good looking heterosexual couples are allowed to dwell in my properties.

But I thought you liked lesbians, didn't you make your wife and her friend get it on?

No i did not make them and they are not lesbians they had some girly fun is all and yes i like watching that and they knew that so they put on a really good show. They are really feminen girls not those brick shithouse types on your pic nat. I know lots of women who like to have the occasional bit of girl on girl.

Did you get her pregnant AD?

Yes

Don't fall out with her then, she'll ring the CSA

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Angry Dad wrote:No i did not make them and they are not lesbians they had some girly fun is all and yes i like watching that and they knew that so they put on a really good show. They are really feminen girls not those brick shithouse types on your pic nat. I know lots of women who like to have the occasional bit of girl on girl.

So your wife and her friend were having lesbian sex but they're not lesbians?

If it walks like a dyke....

No they are not lesbians and they dont walk like a dyke either, i reckon you would be the bull dyke though.

scottjames30 wrote:

Angry Dad wrote:

scottjames30 wrote:

Angry Dad wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Angry Dad wrote:Good for him i wouldn't either only perfectly respectable fair haired blue eye'd good looking heterosexual couples are allowed to dwell in my properties.

But I thought you liked lesbians, didn't you make your wife and her friend get it on?

No i did not make them and they are not lesbians they had some girly fun is all and yes i like watching that and they knew that so they put on a really good show. They are really feminen girls not those brick shithouse types on your pic nat. I know lots of women who like to have the occasional bit of girl on girl.

Did you get her pregnant AD?

Yes

Don't fall out with her then, she'll ring the CSA

she is staying with us at the mo had a row with her husband nothing to do with that though but no sign of her going back home yet.

I know I'm old and past it but I don't really get lesbianism - at least not in the way it seems to be portrayed in the media.

Ok, I understand that you can't help the feelings that you have inside you and some women are attracted to other women rather than men - but this is the bit I don't understand - why is it that one of the women always seems to dress and act just like a bloke?

If you don't go for men - then why fall for a woman who acts more like a bloke than a bloke does?

You never seem to see two feminine women together - always (at best) a feminine woman and a blokey type of woman - or at worse - two blokey type of women!

I know I'm a dinosaur and out of my depth on the subject but if you want to be with a woman then surely the last thing you would find attractive is a woman being even more of a man than a man is?

Why not just go for a bloke in the first instance then if that is the case?

Penile fear

The three of us went out to a pub once stayed all evening and then got a taxi home the women got in the back and kicked off they were really sucking face. The driver was having trouble watching the road when we got home and i was paying him he said fucking ell mate i should be paying you.

Sluffy wrote:I know I'm old and past it but I don't really get lesbianism - at least not in the way it seems to be portrayed in the media.

Ok, I understand that you can't help the feelings that you have inside you and some women are attracted to other women rather than men - but this is the bit I don't understand - why is it that one of the women always seems to dress and act just like a bloke?

If you don't go for men - then why fall for a woman who acts more like a bloke than a bloke does?

You never seem to see two feminine women together - always (at best) a feminine woman and a blokey type of woman - or at worse - two blokey type of women!

I know I'm a dinosaur and out of my depth on the subject but if you want to be with a woman then surely the last thing you would find attractive is a woman being even more of a man than a man is?

Why not just go for a bloke in the first instance then if that is the case?

Pretty much sums it up for me as well. One always has a flat top hairstyle and a couple of mandatory tattoos and t'other one can be feminine and quite pretty. I guess one assumes the role of a male in the relationship, and in most cases, do a pretty decent job apart from having a piss standing up.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:What was the landlords reasoning behind him not wanting a lesbian couple in his flat?

Apparently he had bought new Persian rugs the week before.

Edit: ---RT beat me to it...---

gloswhite wrote:Penile fear

They should be ok with you then

True, its not much fun when you've worn it down to a nubbin over the years

I feel sorry for those who haven't had as many opportunities to use it as I have, but hang in there Magoo, you never know, you might break your duck yet.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:What was the landlords reasoning behind him not wanting a lesbian couple in his flat?

Simply because they are gay.

On Isle of Man the Tynwald has never set any equality laws, like in the UK. BUt that is soon to change as the Presidenty (Speaker) has put in motion fast-track laws to equate the IoM laws to those of the England and Wales

Why don't gay and lesbian folk simply accept that certain deeply committed Christian folk are not comfortable with allowing them to swap spit and other bodily fluids under their rooftop?

If the gay and lesbian community were as tolerant as the majority of the heterosexual community there would be no need for all this so called outrage at being victimised.

Not everyone is comfortable with the thought of two men engaging in a bout of botty bashing and all the legislation in the world isn't going to change their fundamental opinion.

Much easier to move on to the next B & B where the Landlord / Landlady has a much more liberal approach provided the funds are produced.

gloswhite wrote:True, its not much fun when you've worn it down to a nubbin over the years

I feel sorry for those who haven't had as many opportunities to use it as I have, but hang in there Magoo, you never know, you might break your duck yet.

Are you saying I inter fear with wild life, glos is accusing me of fucking a duck.

Mr Magoo wrote:

gloswhite wrote:True, its not much fun when you've worn it down to a nubbin over the years

I feel sorry for those who haven't had as many opportunities to use it as I have, but hang in there Magoo, you never know, you might break your duck yet.

Are you saying I inter fear with wild life, glos is accusing me of fucking a duck.

You are forgiven for making the mistake because of your poor eyesight. Have you ever considered contact lenses?

As long as you say "because I'm a (insert religion here)" you can persecute anyone you want.

remove the religion and you're a bigot.

Natasha Whittam wrote:A couple of lesbians from the Isle of Man are seething after a landlord refused to rent his flat to them because they were "rug munchers".



Kira Izzard and Laura Cull (both quite butch, above) have been informed this is perfectly legal in the Isle of Man and been advised to shut up and stop buying flat shoes and dungarees.

We might not agree with it, but surely the whole point of being British is being able to refuse entry to gays, lezzers, gingers, United fans, fat people, smelly people, bald people etc?

Bloody Hell Natasha!!! Adolf Hitler had simmilar views.

Reebok Trotter wrote:Why don't gay and lesbian folk simply accept that certain deeply committed Christian folk are not comfortable with allowing them to swap spit and other bodily fluids under their rooftop?

If the gay and lesbian community were as tolerant as the majority of the heterosexual community there would be no need for all this so called outrage at being victimised.

Not everyone is comfortable with the thought of two men engaging in a bout of botty bashing and all the legislation in the world isn't going to change their fundamental opinion.

Much easier to move on to the next B & B where the Landlord / Landlady has a much more liberal approach provided the funds are produced.

Spot on Reebok Totter ( sorry ) lad,the view of the vast majority in a nutshell

Tigermin wrote:

Reebok Trotter wrote:Why don't gay and lesbian folk simply accept that certain deeply committed Christian folk are not comfortable with allowing them to swap spit and other bodily fluids under their rooftop?

If the gay and lesbian community were as tolerant as the majority of the heterosexual community there would be no need for all this so called outrage at being victimised.

Not everyone is comfortable with the thought of two men engaging in a bout of botty bashing and all the legislation in the world isn't going to change their fundamental opinion.

Much easier to move on to the next B & B where the Landlord / Landlady has a much more liberal approach provided the funds are produced.

Spot on Reebok Totter ( sorry ) lad,the view of the vast majority in a nutshell

Frame that Quote,

Reebok Trotter wrote:

Sluffy wrote:I know I'm old and past it but I don't really get lesbianism - at least not in the way it seems to be portrayed in the media.

Ok, I understand that you can't help the feelings that you have inside you and some women are attracted to other women rather than men - but this is the bit I don't understand - why is it that one of the women always seems to dress and act just like a bloke?

If you don't go for men - then why fall for a woman who acts more like a bloke than a bloke does?

You never seem to see two feminine women together - always (at best) a feminine woman and a blokey type of woman - or at worse - two blokey type of women!

I know I'm a dinosaur and out of my depth on the subject but if you want to be with a woman then surely the last thing you would find attractive is a woman being even more of a man than a man is?

Why not just go for a bloke in the first instance then if that is the case?

Pretty much sums it up for me as well. One always has a flat top hairstyle and a couple of mandatory tattoos and t'other one can be feminine and quite pretty. I guess one assumes the role of a male in the relationship, and in most cases, do a pretty decent job apart from having a piss standing up.

The butch one will always live with a condition known as strapadicktome!
Sorry, the old ones are the best!!