Should Freedman get the sack?

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Reebok Trotter wrote:

Just because somebody doesn't go to a game doesn't mean that they are not entitled to an opinion. I didn't go yesterday but Wanderlust did and he reported that we didn't play badly apart from lacking a cutting edge in midfield.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion but it's a lot easier to defend Freedman when you're not actually paying money to watch this utter crap.

Reebok Trotter wrote:

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Reebok Trotter wrote:

JAH wrote:

OC was a far superior manager to DF. OC got a team promoted, got us to a top 10 finish in the Premier and to the semi final of the fa cup playing some of the most attractive football seen by a Bolton side since the White Hot years. DF had not and never will achieve any of this.

   

JAH is right. Coyle got Burnley promoted and BWFC to an FA Cup semi-final, and in fairness there was a period when Holden was on fire when we were a joy to watch.

Under Freedman we have seen nothing but failure, and worst of all, absolute shite football.

Easy for sluffy to defend Freedman sat in his mansion down South on match day. Perhaps if he had to shell out his cash to watch this utter shite he might change his tune.

Coyle was a shite manager, but at least with Coyle in charge there was always the chance of scoring a goal or two - under Freedman our attack has never been so blunt.

There were plenty of Wanderers fans screaming for Coyle's head. As you said yourself, he was a shite manager.

Just because somebody doesn't go to a game doesn't mean that they are not entitled to an opinion. I didn't go yesterday but Wanderlust did and he reported that we didn't play badly apart from lacking a cutting edge in midfield.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Reebok Trotter wrote:

Just because somebody doesn't go to a game doesn't mean that they are not entitled to an opinion. I didn't go yesterday but Wanderlust did and he reported that we didn't play badly apart from lacking a cutting edge in midfield.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion but it's a lot easier to defend Freedman when you're not actually paying money to watch this utter crap.

wanderlust wrote:I don't think that DF can be compared to any previous manager as no manager to date hasn't had some sort of budget to change things around when needed. He's attempting to repair a very bad situation and I think that many people don't realise how bad it really is. It's not just that the players he inherited are overpaid or underperforming - they're just not good enough for this level IMO. They may have been once, but they're not now and we're stuck with them.

wanderlust wrote:Promotion favourites? 

wanderlust wrote:Promotion favourites? 

carrs wrote:

wanderlust wrote:Promotion favourites? 

Why don't you answer the question for your beloved dickhead Doug, what did he do over the summer and what has he done since.

Norpig wrote:

wanderlust wrote:Promotion favourites? 

 before the season started we were, according to the bookies and various other pundits.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Wolves were one of the favourites in 2012 too.

It doesn't actually mean anything apart from the amount of money thats gone on each club.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Wolves were one of the favourites in 2012 too.

It doesn't actually mean anything apart from the amount of money thats gone on each club.

bwfc1874 wrote:

carrs wrote:

wanderlust wrote:Promotion favourites? 

Why don't you answer the question for your beloved dickhead Doug, what did he do over the summer and what has he done since.

In fairness it's a pretty stupid question, we can all see what players were brought in and nobody knows what the planning etc was behind closed doors. 

You clearly have an opinion on what went on so just go ahead and say it if you want.

Copper Dragon wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Wolves were one of the favourites in 2012 too.

It doesn't actually mean anything apart from the amount of money thats gone on each club.

It means that you were one of the favourites for promotion with the bookies.

It may not have been your personal view at the start of the season but that doesn't mean Bolton weren't one of the favourites.

Hipster_Nebula wrote:

Copper Dragon wrote:

Hipster_Nebula wrote:Wolves were one of the favourites in 2012 too.

It doesn't actually mean anything apart from the amount of money thats gone on each club.

It means that you were one of the favourites for promotion with the bookies.

It may not have been your personal view at the start of the season but that doesn't mean Bolton weren't one of the favourites.

I missed where i denied they were one of the favourites. 

my point was the odds amount to very little at the end of the day.