bwfc1874 wrote:Whitesince63 wrote:bwfc1874 wrote:Whitesince63 wrote:He's made over 20 signings, loan and permanent since he's been here and none of them work, in fact not one can consider themselves a regular first teamer other than through necessity. Bleating on about youth is now wearing very thin, recruiting for the future is bluff, we need action now not tomorrow. It's ok getting rid of our high earners but if you're only going to reinvest in crap what's the point?
None of his signings work? None of them can consider themselves first teamers? Danns, Moritz, Beckford, Medo, Spearing, Baptiste, McNaughton, Dawson - Not one of these worked or could have considered themselves first teamers?
This cliché of 'throw the youth in' is getting really old, if they're not ready (and we've seen nothing to suggest they are) then it's no good throwing them in yet. He's said himself he's expecting them to start coming through next season.
Recruiting for the future is a bluff? He's signed more youth team players in 15 months with us than I can recall Megson/Coyle doing throughout their combined tenure. The fact you won't acknowledge this because you want instant results only goes to show you don't know what you're talking about I'm afraid, players need time to develop.
74' if you're going to respond to a post then at least read it until you understand it. Secondly don't put things in there that weren't said. None of those players you named can consider themselves first choice because they spend as much time out of the team as in it. The simple fact is none of them are good enough.
No problem signing kids for the years to come, any manager with the academy we have would do that. I didn't say throw untried and inexperienced young players in but in case you hadn't noticed, we are only just outside the bottom 3 and could well be in it before we next play at home. Next year isn't good enough we need players who can perform now so we stay up. I personally think we're in serious, serious danger of going down under Freedman. Sadly you're the kind who will allow it to happen with your pathetic, myopic illusion of him. Not me who doesn't know what he's talking about 74 and I'll have no pleasure in reminding you of that in Div 1 next year.
What have I put in there that wasn't in your post?
All of the above were or are regularly in the first team. If you don't think any of them are good enough, then I'd like to know who in our squad you think is?
Clearly Myopic is your favourite word at the moment, but Im not claiming Freedman's done a great job this season or that we aren't in a relegation fight. Im just a little more realistic about what our problems are than you. Stating that all of the above players aren't good enough is wrong IMO, and Im not sure how you can make a judgement like that when you've refused to see any games under Freedman.
Look 74, you and I will never agree on Freedman ok? You think you're realistic. Well realistic is opening your eyes to what's really happening which you clearly don't want to do. Just think of the players we had in the past and compare them to the dross we have now. No I don't think they're anywhere near good enough and I think our league position tells me that. I've seen plenty of Freedman's team thank you to know how bad they are, although I could be wrong and it may just be the incomprehensible tactics Freedman uses or his arrogant, unlikeable attitude, his lack of man management capability or his stubborn refusal to accept his selections don't work.
It could be any of these things but ultimately it doesn't matter because whatever it is it's getting worse and as long as he's here that's the way it will be. Anyway, just don't read my posts any more because we'll never agree on this or anything else.