They wanted Bread to sign a confession,but his defiance shows no sign of abating.
Bonce's own personal thread
+17
BoltonTillIDie
okocha
jussi22
Sluffy
wanderlust
scottjames30
Reebok Trotter
Norpig
Mr Magoo
Banks of the Croal
Keegan
Chairmanda
Bwfc1958
Numpty 28723
Natasha Whittam
boltonbonce
karlypants
21 posters
442 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 17:03
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
The world is full of people who said they were never posting again. Can't remember any who actually did it.
444 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 17:07
Guest
Guest
I'm finding the Bread Bonce package deal stranger by the day, why can't one post without the other?
445 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 17:09
karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Because they are both in love?bwfc1874 wrote:I'm finding the Bread Bonce package deal stranger by the day, why can't one post without the other?
446 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 17:11
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
We might be the same poster.
447 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 17:17
Guest
Guest
No chance, I do find your bond weird though.
I think you might be sharing a bedsit.
I think you might be sharing a bedsit.
448 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 17:27
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
That would be scary. Although we have similar tastes in many areas,his shit telescope would always be a fly in the ointment.bwfc1874 wrote:No chance, I do find your bond weird though.
I think you might be sharing a bedsit.
He also supports the wrong NFL franchise.
I can only hope he gets the help and support he needs,because nuts needs him posting again.
Sir Bruce is sending Kenny Lynch and Tarbie down to get me out. Don't know what the plan is. Knowing my luck they'll probably be arrested by officers from operation Yewtree.
451 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 17:36
Guest
Guest
Or the hulk and Bruce.......banner
452 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 17:41
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
Obviously someone wants a less post count on here at the moment to prove a point, probably so they can say ' I told you so 'Ner.Natasha Whittam wrote:Norpig wrote:i have a feeling him and Breaders have decided not to post on here now, hope i'm wrong though
They're setting up their own forum - Bolton Bellends - and have offered me £50 and a bag of salted nuts to front it.
Childish, but up to them.
453 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 17:46
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
scottjames30 wrote:Obviously someone wants a less post count on here at the moment to prove a point, probably so they can say ' I told you so 'Ner.Natasha Whittam wrote:Norpig wrote:i have a feeling him and Breaders have decided not to post on here now, hope i'm wrong though
They're setting up their own forum - Bolton Bellends - and have offered me £50 and a bag of salted nuts to front it.
Childish, but up to them.
454 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 18:10
Guest
Guest
Thanks to Scott for proving beyond all doubt that my decision to disappear and stop posting was the correct one.
Not the creating "a less post count" (sic) thing. (If that's even English....)
No, I mean by demonstrating that he's still going to keep having a go and posting digs even when I've stopped posting.
I've seen a different side to Nuts over all this and I no longer have the confidence I once had that everything's above board and on the level in terms of the validity and genuine nature of many of the accounts.
And that's all I'm saying on the subject because I'm not prepared to go into what was said to me specifically via PM, other than I was told that one of the regulars on here was one of the co-owners but when I contacted him he advised me that it was a load of bollocks, he wasn't one of the owners and I shouldn't believe what I'd been told. Or indeed anything else that I'd been toild by this individual.
And I don't like being made to look stupid in public, hence why I've backed off.
Not the creating "a less post count" (sic) thing. (If that's even English....)
No, I mean by demonstrating that he's still going to keep having a go and posting digs even when I've stopped posting.
I've seen a different side to Nuts over all this and I no longer have the confidence I once had that everything's above board and on the level in terms of the validity and genuine nature of many of the accounts.
And that's all I'm saying on the subject because I'm not prepared to go into what was said to me specifically via PM, other than I was told that one of the regulars on here was one of the co-owners but when I contacted him he advised me that it was a load of bollocks, he wasn't one of the owners and I shouldn't believe what I'd been told. Or indeed anything else that I'd been toild by this individual.
And I don't like being made to look stupid in public, hence why I've backed off.
455 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 18:15
scottjames30
Nat Lofthouse
How do you know that post was meant for you?Breadman wrote:Thanks to Scott for proving beyond all doubt that my decision to disappear and stop posting was the correct one.
Not the creating "a less post count" (sic) thing. (If that's even English....)
No, I mean by demonstrating that he's still going to keep having a go and posting digs even when I've stopped posting.
It could've been Bonce, or are you saying that im not allowed an opinion anymore, or are you just waiting to ambush me at every attempt then drag up loads of old rubbish, that everyone else can draw a line under and move on?
456 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 18:16
Guest
Guest
Breadman wrote:Thanks to Scott for proving beyond all doubt that my decision to disappear and stop posting was the correct one.
Not the creating "a less post count" (sic) thing. (If that's even English....)
No, I mean by demonstrating that he's still going to keep having a go and posting digs even when I've stopped posting.
I've seen a different side to Nuts over all this and I no longer have the confidence I once had that everything's above board and on the level in terms of the validity and genuine nature of many of the accounts.
And that's all I'm saying on the subject because I'm not prepared to go into what was said to me specifically via PM, other than I was told that one of the regulars on here was one of the co-owners but when I contacted him he advised me that it was a load of bollocks, he wasn't one of the owners and I shouldn't believe what I'd been told. Or indeed anything else that I'd been toild by this individual.
And I don't like being made to look stupid in public, hence why I've backed off.
Ive heard the same rumours bredders. At the end of the day everyone on here doesnt tell the truth 100% of the time (apart from me)
I dont think you look stupid and there are a lot more hoping for you to keep posting than those against. So, fuck all the rest. Put your big girl pants on and tell us a story about your time in prison (today )
458 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 18:19
Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
I vote Johnny off.
459 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 18:24
boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Don't ask him where he hid the soap.
460 Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 18:29
Guest
Guest
Screw you nat. I'm your new stalker whether you like it or not
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum