Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Bonce's own personal thread

+17
BoltonTillIDie
okocha
jussi22
Sluffy
wanderlust
scottjames30
Reebok Trotter
Norpig
Mr Magoo
Banks of the Croal
Keegan
Chairmanda
Bwfc1958
Numpty 28723
Natasha Whittam
boltonbonce
karlypants
21 posters

Go to page : Previous  1 ... 13 ... 23, 24, 25 ... 37 ... 50  Next

Go down  Message [Page 24 of 50]

461Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 18:56

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

scottjames30 wrote:
Breadman wrote:Thanks to Scott for proving beyond all doubt that my decision to disappear and stop posting was the correct one.

Not the creating "a less post count" (sic) thing. (If that's even English....)

No, I mean by demonstrating that he's still going to keep having a go and posting digs even when I've stopped posting.


How do you know that post was meant for you?

It could've been Bonce, or are you saying that im not allowed an opinion anymore, or are you just waiting to ambush me at every attempt then drag up loads of old rubbish, that everyone else can draw a line under and move on?

didn't take long did it?  :facepalm: Please can you two put each other on your foes list

462Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 19:01

Mr Magoo

Mr Magoo
Youri Djorkaeff
Youri Djorkaeff

I think she is overreacting

463Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 19:34

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Which she? or do you mean me?  Very Happy

464Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 20:02

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

Breadman wrote:I've seen a different side to Nuts over all this and I no longer have the confidence I once had that everything's above board and on the level in terms of the validity and genuine nature of many of the accounts.

And that's all I'm saying on the subject because I'm not prepared to go into what was said to me specifically via PM, other than I was told that one of the regulars on here was one of the co-owners but when I contacted him he advised me that it was a load of bollocks, he wasn't one of the owners and I shouldn't believe what I'd been told. Or indeed anything else that I'd been toild by this individual.

And I don't like being made to look stupid in public, hence why I've backed off.

I don't know what you want us to say really as we simply can't 'guarantee' the authenticity of anything!

What I mean is that the nature of an internet forum is (by and large) that few of the posters on here actually know anyone else from the site in real life and therefore it is impossible to tell if their internet personas they use are real or fake.

On top of that it is very easy if you have a mind to, to create fake accounts that get around the few measures most forums have of preventing them.  

People simply create numerous email addresses to register from, use proxy ip addresses that can't be traced and post away as whoever they want to be.

For what it is worth we have baned all KNOWN fake accounts but there are still a number that we 'think' are fake but we can't PROVE are.

What do we do - ban everyone we are unsure of?  They simply just bob up again a short time later under a new account if we do.  The ones that don't were probably genuine posters in the first place - that we've just fired off for nothing at all, other than we didn't like the look of them!

We are all supposed to be grown up on here with a modicum of common sense each, so it should not be too hard to take most of what is said on any forum with a certain degree of scepticism - at least that is what I do.

The people who run this site do it in their own time, for free and with general good intent.  We do it for the love of our club, the wanting to socialise with like minded souls and above all for a bit of a shared craic.

We aren't the masters of the universe, we can't stop people being pillocks on the internet, we aren't here to fulfil some personal shortcomings we have in our private lives such as having the power to send into the etherial wilderness, internet 'personas' we don't like, we simply want to relax and enjoy the site like the rest of you and very occassionally ask people to 'pack it in' when they've gone that bit too far.

As for being made to look stupid in public, well have you - does anybody know who you really are - and of the very few who might - how many of them would actually give a toss about it - because they KNOW the real you.

Christ I'm made out to be nothing less than Satan if you listen to the outpourings of some of those I've simply ask to 'behave' in the past - and who have taken that as a personal slight of their manhood and something to be revenged upon at all costs upon!

Fuck me it's just the internet!

Sticks and stones and all that.

It's obviously clear that 99% of the site likes you mate and that you like 99% of us too!

So how about coming back, simply blocking the ones you don't like and enjoying the rest of us and the site itself?

Surely that's the best way to go for everybody's sake.

465Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 20:15

Guest


Guest

See un peace ambassador

466Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 20:21

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Jesus

467Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 20:34

Guest


Guest

Anyway, this is bonce's thread and hideaway for all things brucey related, not for the virus to spread into here.

So as you were boncey.....hows bruces funeral plans coming along?

468Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 20:38

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

y2johnny wrote:Anyway, this is bonce's thread and hideaway for all things brucey related, not for the virus to spread into here.

So as you were boncey.....hows bruces funeral plans coming along?
Same as usual.
He won't stay in the box. Keeps kicking the lid off.

469Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 20:43

Guest


Guest

Hahahaha. Stick a chew toy or a rattle in there. It will keep him quiet.

Are you still planning to eat him bit by bit or bathe in his ashes?

470Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 20:51

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

He won't burn. I'm thinking of having him stuffed.
My main plan is to extract the Brucie DNA,and create a complete community of 'Bruces'.
Everyone in the Town will be a 'Bruce'. Taxi driver,butcher,postman ,everyone. Just think of it.
I'm just worried that there won't be enough Miss Worlds to go round.
The football team would be quite a sight.

471Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 20:53

Guest


Guest

Sounds like a stephen king novel to me.

As long as you dont try to recreate the human centipede with you in the middle

472Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 21:04

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

y2johnny wrote:Sounds like a stephen king novel to me.

As long as you dont try to recreate the human centipede with you in the middle
Hmm. That idea has legs.

473Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Mon Jan 05 2015, 21:40

Guest


Guest

Yeah too many

474Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Tue Jan 06 2015, 08:30

Guest


Guest

Sluffy wrote:
Breadman wrote:I've seen a different side to Nuts over all this and I no longer have the confidence I once had that everything's above board and on the level in terms of the validity and genuine nature of many of the accounts.

And that's all I'm saying on the subject because I'm not prepared to go into what was said to me specifically via PM, other than I was told that one of the regulars on here was one of the co-owners but when I contacted him he advised me that it was a load of bollocks, he wasn't one of the owners and I shouldn't believe what I'd been told. Or indeed anything else that I'd been toild by this individual.

And I don't like being made to look stupid in public, hence why I've backed off.

I don't know what you want us to say really as we simply can't 'guarantee' the authenticity of anything!

What I mean is that the nature of an internet forum is (by and large) that few of the posters on here actually know anyone else from the site in real life and therefore it is impossible to tell if their internet personas they use are real or fake.

On top of that it is very easy if you have a mind to, to create fake accounts that get around the few measures most forums have of preventing them.  

People simply create numerous email addresses to register from, use proxy ip addresses that can't be traced and post away as whoever they want to be.

For what it is worth we have baned all KNOWN fake accounts but there are still a number that we 'think' are fake but we can't PROVE are.

What do we do - ban everyone we are unsure of?  They simply just bob up again a short time later under a new account if we do.  The ones that don't were probably genuine posters in the first place - that we've just fired off for nothing at all, other than we didn't like the look of them!

We are all supposed to be grown up on here with a modicum of common sense each, so it should not be too hard to take most of what is said on any forum with a certain degree of scepticism - at least that is what I do.

The people who run this site do it in their own time, for free and with general good intent.  We do it for the love of our club, the wanting to socialise with like minded souls and above all for a bit of a shared craic.

We aren't the masters of the universe, we can't stop people being pillocks on the internet, we aren't here to fulfil some personal shortcomings we have in our private lives such as having the power to send into the etherial wilderness, internet 'personas' we don't like, we simply want to relax and enjoy the site like the rest of you and very occassionally ask people to 'pack it in' when they've gone that bit too far.

As for being made to look stupid in public, well have you - does anybody know who you really are - and of the very few who might - how many of them would actually give a toss about it - because they KNOW the real you.

Christ I'm made out to be nothing less than Satan if you listen to the outpourings of some of those I've simply ask to 'behave' in the past - and who have taken that as a personal slight of their manhood and something to be revenged upon at all costs upon!

Fuck me it's just the internet!

Sticks and stones and all that.

It's obviously clear that 99% of the site likes you mate and that you like 99% of us too!

So how about coming back, simply blocking the ones you don't like and enjoying the rest of us and the site itself?

Surely that's the best way to go for everybody's sake.

I think what we all want to know is who this co-owner bread was talking about is. Transparency is the only way to move forward here.

475Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Tue Jan 06 2015, 08:44

Guest


Guest

Unless we were paying to be on here and it was funding terrorism or going into research so Bruce Forsyth can live forever what difference does it make who the owner is? 

P.S It's Campos Wig

476Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Tue Jan 06 2015, 09:21

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin

bwfc1874 wrote:I think what we all want to know is who this co-owner bread was talking about is. Transparency is the only way to move forward here.

Anyone else see the irony of someone asking the question of 'transparency' on here whilst posting as a nom de plume themselves!

The simple fact is that though when we set this site up the only condition that to any extent which was stipulated was that the other two founders wanted to be incognito.

What's it matter anyway, do we really KNOW who pulls the strings at BWFC - the club debt is vastly greater than any wealth Davies ever had - but we still avidly follow the club through thick and thin.

Nuts is free to join, we don't make any money from it, nobody is forced to be here, there's plenty other alternative sites to go on if you don't like us - do you know who the owners of those sites are though - does it truly matter that much to anyone?

It's only the internet remember.

477Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Tue Jan 06 2015, 14:28

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Sometimes a headline is enough,and reading the story might spoil it.
Police: Drunken man threw telescope at woman after drinking champagne, listening to John Lennon

478Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Tue Jan 06 2015, 14:33

Guest


Guest

boltonbonce wrote:Sometimes a headline is enough,and reading the story might spoil it.
Police: Drunken man threw telescope at woman after drinking champagne, listening to John Lennon

was it an inferior telescope, and did he have no pants on?

479Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Tue Jan 06 2015, 14:35

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

y2johnny wrote:
boltonbonce wrote:Sometimes a headline is enough,and reading the story might spoil it.
Police: Drunken man threw telescope at woman after drinking champagne, listening to John Lennon

was it an inferior telescope, and did he have no pants on?
I hope you're not suggesting what I think you are Shocked

480Bonce's own personal thread - Page 24 Empty Re: Bonce's own personal thread Tue Jan 06 2015, 14:49

Guest


Guest

boltonbonce wrote:
y2johnny wrote:
boltonbonce wrote:Sometimes a headline is enough,and reading the story might spoil it.
Police: Drunken man threw telescope at woman after drinking champagne, listening to John Lennon

was it an inferior telescope, and did he have no pants on?
I hope you're not suggesting what I think you are Shocked

i think you know yourself deep down don't you bonce.

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 24 of 50]

Go to page : Previous  1 ... 13 ... 23, 24, 25 ... 37 ... 50  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum