You are not connected. Please login or register

Bolton Nuts » BWFC » Wandering Minds » Open letter to Scott

Open letter to Scott

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Go down  Message [Page 5 of 7]

121Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 15:58

Guest


Guest
Might bang a few pairs of mine on ebay then

122Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 16:05

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Sorry about this. I've done it again. I've turned your serious discussion about Scott into a 'Brucie' issue.
I'll shut up now. Honest.

123Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 16:08

Mr Magoo

Mr Magoo
Youri Djorkaeff
Youri Djorkaeff
121 reply's :wtf2:

124Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 16:10

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
and about 110 not on topic Laughing

125Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 16:17

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
And as usual it has become a free for all! Very Happy

126Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 16:19

Mr Magoo

Mr Magoo
Youri Djorkaeff
Youri Djorkaeff
Isn't it fun Laughing

127Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 16:20

Norpig

Norpig
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
@Mr Magoo wrote:Isn't it fun Laughing

it's the only thing that gets me through a days work Very Happy

128Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 16:22

Mr Magoo

Mr Magoo
Youri Djorkaeff
Youri Djorkaeff
Very Happy

129Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 20:32

Keegan

Keegan
Moderator
Moderator
@karlypants wrote:In all fairness, everyone who works behind the scenes hold no secrets between one another.

Open letter to Scott - Page 5 57171323

https://forum.boltonnuts.co.uk

130Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 20:39

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Open letter to Scott - Page 5 57171605

131Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 20:43

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
There's no incest going on here Keegan!

That's up the road in Blackburn!!! :biggrin:

132Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 20:43

Keegan

Keegan
Moderator
Moderator
Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Coin%20flip

https://forum.boltonnuts.co.uk

133Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 20:45

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
You should have let magoo have the coin.
He's an ace tosser.

134Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 20:47

Mr Magoo

Mr Magoo
Youri Djorkaeff
Youri Djorkaeff
:falltopieces: :falltopieces:

135Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 20:51

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
@Mr Magoo wrote::falltopieces: :falltopieces:
:rofl: :rofl:

136Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 20:52

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
@boltonbonce wrote:
@Mr Magoo wrote::falltopieces: :falltopieces:
:rofl: :rofl:
Magoo is only good at tossing other peoples coins...

137Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 20:53

Guest


Guest
Your predictive text changed absolute to ace for some reason bonce

138Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 20:54

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
@y2johnny wrote:Your predictive text changed absolute to ace for some reason bonce
Very Happy Very Happy

139Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 20:54

Mr Magoo

Mr Magoo
Youri Djorkaeff
Youri Djorkaeff
@karlypants wrote:
@boltonbonce wrote:
@Mr Magoo wrote::falltopieces: :falltopieces:
:rofl: :rofl:
Magoo is only good at tossing other peoples coins...
:tumbleweed:

140Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 22:33

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin
Breadman wrote:
We all know he's coming back...

Not necessarily.

The site tries to be open and welcoming to  everyone and thereby lays its inherant weakness because not everyone can always see eye to eye with each other.

Sooner or later something is said or done that offends or upsets someone else and it is usually the mods job to sort out the mess afterwards.

Yes all other forums that I've been on have a very black and white view of modding - you are either 'one of them' or banned for ever if you are not.

This to me leads to all the other forums being one dimensional - they all end up with posters by enlarge having a very similar point of view on a very broad range of issues - there is very little divergence from the line taken by that sites clique and to me those sites becoming predictable and boring - although they are very easy to mod!

I take a different view, I welcome characters - not the fake multiple ones from the same person or two but the ones that have a different perspective on things.

Yes they can be 'difficult' at times and cross the line more than you would wish but at least it gives the forum something different and unpredictable than all the other forums.

I'm not saying Scott is 'a character' but his style and passion, his pig headness and sometimes stupidity, does stimulate and energises what may otherwise have been a staid and predictable day.

He is not indispensible though - his ban was meant and is only being reconsidered because he has approached us and does seem to be contrite about his actions.

Yes we are not stupid, we know he might just be saying that to get back on here BUT the mere fact he wants to return suggests he's learned his lesson and that anymore shit from him would mean that would be the end of him on here - and he clearly doesn't want that.

On the other hand though there's no point in allowing him back if you or anyone else doesn't want to be part of the site anymore because of it.

Ideally I'd like to get back to how we were before when we all got along fine with each other.  

That can only happen if you BOTH can move on from what as happend.

Scott is wanting to try and we're willing to take that chance but if you can't move on and can not tolerate his return then there's no point in allowing him back.

For the good of the site I act as though I've no idea that the same persons I talk to on here in warm and friendly terms are the same people who post the repetitive shit about me on Burnden Aces weekly for the last three years!

Maybe I've got thicker skin than most, I don't know but it simply does not bother me.  They are just wasting their time and frittering their lives away achieving what exactly, as far as I'm concerned.

But you aren't in a position to think about what is good for the site, you only have to consider yourself, so can you try to live with Scott on here one final time or do you want us to close the door on him for good?

I didn't really want to put you on the spot but it is the only way to clear the air and move on one way or the another.

141Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 22:53

Mr Magoo

Mr Magoo
Youri Djorkaeff
Youri Djorkaeff
Just let him back, if he starts just kick him out simple, fuck me its only another shitty forum not real life.

142Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 23:25

Boggersbelief

Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Right, the majority have said Scott can come back. Sort it out mods

143Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 23:27

boltonbonce

boltonbonce
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
Scott is desperate to come back.
Open letter to Scott - Page 5 0

144Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 23:29

karlypants

karlypants
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
@Mr Magoo wrote:fuck me its only another shitty forum
:banned:

145Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 23:29

Boggersbelief

Boggersbelief
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse
@boltonbonce wrote:Scott is desperate to come back.
Open letter to Scott - Page 5 0

lol!

146Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Mon Dec 15 2014, 23:52

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin
@Boggersbelief wrote:Right, the majority have said Scott can come back. Sort it out mods

I think the right thing to do in this instance is to see how Bread feels about things.

You know how I feel, I've spelled it out above but if by bringing Scott back, Bread feels he has to leave then what have we achieved, in fact it makes things worse in that Bread was the one sinned against in the first place!  That clearly can't be the right outcome.

Clearly I'm hoping Bread will give it another try but I rather him come to that view himself rather than be brow beaten in to it or have it forced on him anyway.

Seems the right way to progress things to me.




And Magoo this isn't any old shitty forum - it's OUR shitty forum!

147Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Tue Dec 16 2014, 00:25

Bwfc1958

Bwfc1958
Tinned Toms - You know it makes sense!
Going off breads previous comments I think it would be fair to say that he doesn't want scott back on here but doesn't want the responsibility to be on him to make a decision on whether someone should be banned from the forum or not. I think the decision lies with you here sluffy and the other mods. Maybe it would be better for you to pm bread and ask him rather than get him to publicly make a decision?

148Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Tue Dec 16 2014, 00:56

Sluffy

Sluffy
Admin
I had alread thought along those lines anyway.

The thing is though that my position on this matter is already public and if the site was not to allow Scott back then it would not take much working out as why that had not happened.

So I rather be open on the matter.

However Bread feels will effect the decision, whether we are informed of it by pm or on the public forum.

His decision would not be about banning Scott - he's already banned - but rather if he could tolerate to be on the same forum as him again.

If he can't then what is the point of recinding Scott's ban if it results in his 'victim' having to leave the forum - that can't be a fair outcome can it?

If he can then why not say so publicly and take the credit for it rather than let it look as though we had 'hoisted' a decision upon him?

Yes we could easily take the decision from Bread and bring Scott back but unless Bread can also draw a line under what as happened then things would only fester and that would only lead to trouble further down the line.

I rather get things out in the open now.

It's the only sensible way I think to deal with this so everyone knows exactly where they stand.

149Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Tue Dec 16 2014, 01:07

Bwfc1958

Bwfc1958
Tinned Toms - You know it makes sense!
@Sluffy wrote:

The thing is though that my position on this matter is already public and if the site was not to allow Scott back then it would not take much working out as why that had not happened.

So I rather be open on the matter.

However Bread feels will effect the decision, whether we are informed of it by pm or on the public forum.



If he can then why not say so publicly and take the credit for it rather than let it look as though we had 'hoisted' a decision upon him?

Fair point.

150Open letter to Scott - Page 5 Empty Re: Open letter to Scott on Tue Dec 16 2014, 07:53

Guest


Guest
@Sluffy wrote:I had alread thought along those lines anyway.

The thing is though that my position on this matter is already public and if the site was not to allow Scott back then it would not take much working out as why that had not happened.

So I rather be open on the matter.

However Bread feels will effect the decision, whether we are informed of it by pm or on the public forum.

His decision would not be about banning Scott - he's already banned - but rather if he could tolerate to be on the same forum as him again.

If he can't then what is the point of recinding Scott's ban if it results in his 'victim' having to leave the forum - that can't be a fair outcome can it?

If he can then why not say so publicly and take the credit for it rather than let it look as though we had 'hoisted' a decision upon him?

Yes we could easily take the decision from Bread and bring Scott back but unless Bread can also draw a line under what as happened then things would only fester and that would only lead to trouble further down the line.

I rather get things out in the open now.

It's the only sensible way I think to deal with this so everyone knows exactly where they stand.

Why doesn't Bread add Scott to his foes list and vice versa, then they can't see what each other is writing. So one can't wind up and the other can't react.

Back to top  Message [Page 5 of 7]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum