In all seriousness I've heard people praising her 'remarkable resilience' - essentially for not resigning despite getting battered for 2 years.
Embarrassingly low standards.
Embarrassingly low standards.
T.R.O.Y wrote:She's responsible for the state of these negotiations over the last two years, she triggered Article 50 without laying any groundwork, she called a general election and she set her red lines - which pandered to the right of her party and made a rod for her own back in negotiations.
If this is 'her best' it's a long way short of the standards we need.
T.R.O.Y wrote:She's responsible for the state of these negotiations over the last two years, she triggered Article 50 without laying any groundwork, she called a general election and she set her red lines - which pandered to the right of her party and made a rod for her own back in negotiations.
If this is 'her best' it's a long way short of the standards we need.
T.R.O.Y wrote:So your solution to that is to lower your standards and congratulate her for doing a great job at not resigning?
I'd prefer them to be held to account.
T.R.O.Y wrote:Laughable that anyone can look at her performance and say anything positive.
Natasha Whittam wrote:T.R.O.Y wrote:Laughable that anyone can look at her performance and say anything positive.
You always let yourself down with the insults. I have a differing view, just accept it.
Natasha Whittam wrote:T.R.O.Y wrote:So your solution to that is to lower your standards and congratulate her for doing a great job at not resigning?
I'd prefer them to be held to account.
It's easy to say you'd hold them to account when you sit in the Labour camp.
She's done a good job in difficult circumstances, that's all I'm saying.
T.R.O.Y wrote:Bob on XM, she made a rod for her own back by going for popularity with her party over what was good for the country. Laughable that anyone can look at her performance and say anything positive.
Following the election, the opposition Labour Party withdrew its opposition to holding an in-out EU referendum. On the bill's second reading, on 9 June 2015, MPs voted by 544 to 53 in favour of the principle of holding a referendum with only the Scottish National Party opposing the Bill.xmiles wrote:
Pandering to the right wing europhobes in the Tory party is her biggest mistake. There was no public demand or even interest in a referendum in the first place. We only had one because Cameron foolishly thought he would win it and that would shut up the right wing element. It wouldn't have worked even if he had won.
Cajunboy wrote:Following the election, the opposition Labour Party withdrew its opposition to holding an in-out EU referendum. On the bill's second reading, on 9 June 2015, MPs voted by 544 to 53 in favour of the principle of holding a referendum with only the Scottish National Party opposing the Bill.xmiles wrote:
Pandering to the right wing europhobes in the Tory party is her biggest mistake. There was no public demand or even interest in a referendum in the first place. We only had one because Cameron foolishly thought he would win it and that would shut up the right wing element. It wouldn't have worked even if he had won.
Cajunboy wrote:So it was okay for The Labour party to destabilise the country after the election?
I see, thanks.
Cajunboy wrote:So it was okay for The Labour party to destabilise the country after the election?
I see, thanks.
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum