BoltonTillIDie wrote:Oh yes, kim Jong-un, well known for robbing Football clubs
. Again interpreting a picture to how you want it to be portrayed. I have never said he has robbed from the club. As many people who have told you before that most people didn’t.
Like me, they didn’t Like the way the club was run by him. Did what he wanted, what was best for him, not what was best for the club, players, employees and fans.Na but like a dictatorship, like erm, Kim Jong Un.
Your Defense to most of these people who have a differing opinion to yourself is that we’re all brain washed by social media and we believe anything we are told.
You know that for a fact then?
You know the laws in respect of trading when the business is insolvency?
You know what is required to keep the right side of the law?
You know what choices he had to make and why he had to make them?
You know for a fact that he ran the club the best for him and not to keep in trading legally for as long as possible?
Or is your opinion based on just hearsay you've read on Facebook, Twitter and the like?
Well you either know the facts of how companies have to be run in insolvency situations or you don't.
It so happens my profession is that of a Company Secretary -
"
The company secretary ensures that an organisation complies with relevant legislation and regulation, and keeps board members informed of their legal responsibilities. Company secretaries are the company's named representative on legal documents,
and it is their responsibility to ensure that the company and its directors operate within the law"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Company_secretaryI've had a very financially rewarding career from it and I like to think I know a bit about it.
So I'll ask you again, do you KNOW any of the questions I've asked above because I don't believe you do.
I believe you've formed your opinions (like so many others) from what you've read from others who are equally clueless about Company Law and running a business whilst in insolvent conditions.
And where perchance did you read such views, it couldn't be from social media could it?
Of course it was!
Fwiw I stood virtually alone at the time stating on here that things were not happening in the way people were saying - I said based on my knowledge of how companies HAVE to run LEGALLY in such conditions. I got dog's abuse for it too, so much so I even stopped posting on here and went on to ww instead.
A year on and after having the company accounts forensically examined by a the Administrator there has been found to be nothing, I'll repeat nothing, that has been reported, filed or otherwise of him, Ken Anderson, having done anything wrong or illegal.
In other words he ran the club in a proper manner, within the law, in the insolvency situation that the club was in.
That's not my opinion, that's a fact following from the Administrators findings.
You might not like it, you probably believe it is wrong, immoral or what ever you want to believe but he did what he had to do to keep the club going for as long as he could until a buyer could be found for it and ultimately saved.
If you think it is easy to sell football clubs then why could Eddie Davies only find Holdsworth to sell to and why was only FV (who let's be honest is underfunded so much so that they've had to renegotiate terms of payment to both EDT and the Administrators company) the only one serious about buying us out of Admin?
And Wigan bar a miracle look to be being put into liquidation in just over a weeks time despite over 80 companies registering with the Administrator an interest in buying them?
You are entitled to your opinion and no doubt it won't change a jot but when it comes to understanding what has happened and why business are compelled to act to keep afloat at times of insolvency/cash flow crises you simply haven't got a clue.
You stick with the social media conspiracy theory and opinion of Anderson and I'll stick with the actions of the Administrator who went through the books and know everything that went on.
One of us is clearly doesn't know what they are talking about and it isn't going to be the Administrator that saw the actual books and is legally compelled to report wrong doing, now is it?