bwfc71 wrote:
3% of the population account for 50% of HIV cases in the UK, so who has the other 50%???
50% are gay men, 50% are straight men & women.
bwfc71 wrote:
3% of the population account for 50% of HIV cases in the UK, so who has the other 50%???
bwfc71 wrote:Because I know its a small risk. Of all teh men you have been with, have you have unprotected sex? If so, how do you know that you haven't got HIV?
bwfc71 wrote:But what about before then?
Natasha Whittam wrote:let me make it clear I am not homophobic
Natasha Whittam wrote:it's time to outlaw gay sex in the UK.
WhiteBic wrote:Don't get me wrong as I do have a few gay friends. But putting your manhood up where you poo from? It is a bit wrong.
Natasha Whittam wrote:Answer me this: would you rather do nothing and keep the gays happy and be wiped out inside 100 years or do something now and secure the future of mankind.
WhiteBic wrote: But putting your manhood up where you poo from? It is a bit wrong.
bwfc71 wrote:ALTERNATIVELY:
Firstly, before you all get your oversized y-fronts in a twist, let me make it clear I am not against Teen Mothers in the slightest, far from it.
However, it has been announced that although the number is down we are still the worst in Europe and ahead of America and Australia when it comes to Teen Mothers.
A small number of those Teen Mothers will have probably been unduly raped by their boyfriends and strangers and due to their religion will not be allowed to have an abortion or be frightened to tell their parents that they are pregnant. But, for one reason ro another, a quite large number of Teen Mothers actually plan to get pregnant whist being a teenager.
So isn't it time we took steps to stop this? It isn't politically correct, but it's time to outlaw sex, between teh ages of 16 (and younger in quite a few cases) and 24 in the UK. It might not be fair, but surely we have to save innocence by any means necessary?
What do you think?
Similar topics
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum