Time To Ban The Gays?

Leeds_Trotter wrote:

It's a shame your father didn't!

I think you need to have a chat with your parents about the 'birds and the bees'.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-21277450

Here is the full ACCURATE story, and not a "Daily Mail" spin from Natasha!

It says unprotected gay sex is spreading HIV at an alarming rate.

Natasha Whittam wrote:It says unprotected gay sex is spreading HIV at an alarming rate.

Amongst the gay community (i.e. men who have sex with men) and not with the bi-sexual community. Now if it was the bi-sexual community then there would be a fraction cause of concern. But as HIV is very manageable nowadays and a cure coming closer each day, the fear of the eradication of the human race to the disease is as big as polio killing off the human race!!!

bwfc71 wrote:
Amongst the gay community (i.e. men who have sex with men) and not with the bi-sexual community. Now if it was the bi-sexual community then there would be a fraction cause of concern. But as HIV is very manageable nowadays and a cure coming closer each day, the fear of the eradication of the human race to the disease is as big as polio killing off the human race!!!

You don't half talk some shite Mr Amos.

There's no such thing as the bi-sexual community. There's the gay community and the straight community and a small percentage of people who visit both.

If Bernard has unprotected sex with an HIV infected man, then sleeps with a woman a week later then the HIV virus is in the straight community - therefore it could kill us all one day. Only virgins like me will be left.

Thing is, Natasha, you area "born again" virgin - and I bet you honestly do not know where your previous partners have been before - of if they ahve told have they told you the truth???

You say I talk shite!!! How would you class "and a small percentage of people of visit both"? I would say that they are bi-sexual!

bwfc71 wrote:Thing is, Natasha, you area "born again" virgin - and I bet you honestly do not know where your previous partners have been before - of if they ahve told have they told you the truth???

You say I talk shite!!! How would you class "and a small percentage of people of visit both"? I would say that they are bi-sexual!

Yes, they are bi-sexual but they don't have a community. Bi-sexual people don't only sleep with other bi-sexuals. They sleep with gay or straight people.

I'm no homophobe, I once sat at the same table as a gay, but when experts start saying mankind could be doomed if we don't stop the spread of HIV I think we need to deal with the root of the prolem.

Experst have not said that - you have. There is nothing in that BBC report, or any other report, to suggest that mankind is at risk. That is all in your head. Mankind has more of a chance of being killed outright by an asteroid or Avian-flu than HIV related illnesses!!!

bwfc71 wrote:Experst have not said that - you have. There is nothing in that BBC report, or any other report, to suggest that mankind is at risk. That is all in your head. Mankind has more of a chance of being killed outright by an asteroid or Avian-flu than HIV related illnesses!!!

So we have a disease for which there is no cure. Every single day of the year people are having unprotected sex, especially in the gay community.

It doesn't take a genius to work out that eventually it will wipe us all out.

They'll have a cure for it long before its a threat to humanity.

Natasha Whittam wrote:

So we have a disease for which there is no cure.

It doesn't take a genius to work out that eventually it will wipe us all out.

Yep, influenza will wipe out humanity long before any other disease does!

You are learning, Natasha!

Boggersbelief wrote:They'll have a cure for it long before its a threat to humanity.

Oh, so you're a scientist now?

Natasha Whittam wrote:

Boggersbelief wrote:They'll have a cure for it long before its a threat to humanity.

Oh, so you're a scientist now?

Yes.

Oh right. Soz.

bwfc71 wrote:There was a caller on The Wright Stuff this morning saying that she had gone undiagnosed for 7 years. She had been drugged raped by a Jamaican, but blood test after blood test the HIV was not tested for until one doctor decided to test for it. Unfortunately for her there was a chain reaction as she had passed the virus on to other men, without knowing. Why should they be killed off for something they didn't know about?

Why is the nationality of the person who allegedly "drugged raped" the caller a part of this post, when the nationality of the caller isn't? Is it important to the story?

Natasha Whittam wrote:It seems my warning should have been heeded:

Huge improvements in treating and testing for HIV have failed to curb infections in gay and bisexual men in England and Wales, a study released today suggests.

Unprotected sex amoungst gay men is rampant and threatens to wipe out mankind in the near future.

So for all you gay men out there, use a fucking condom.

Men should not be putting their dicks in other mens bums its untoward. Shock therapy thats the answer, every time they stick their dicks in a mans bum they get 20.000 volts both

Angry Dad, this is not a thread about homophobia and I'd ask you to keep comments like that to yourself.

This is a thread about preventing the end of mankind.

The most frequent mode of transmission of HIV is through sexual contact with an infected person. Worldwide, the majority of cases of transmission occur through heterosexual contacts (i.e. sexual contacts between people of the opposite sex).

A well sourced, trustworthy and well written Wiki entry about HIV/AIDS. (Don't believe me? Add "HIV is spread by Blackburn fans" to the article and see how long it lasts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HIV/AIDS#Sexual

- Basically, if the world had never produced a single homosexual, HIV/AIDS would still be just as big a problem as it is now.

A very interesting read that taught me a few facts I didn't know about AIDS. Debunking long held myths about how its spread and who by.

I read somewhere that AIDS was started by monkeys in Africa.