Bolton Wanderers Football Club Fan Forum for all BWFC Supporters.


You are not connected. Please login or register

Time To Ban The Gays?

+13
Soul Kitchen
Lyric Todkill
BoltonTillIDie
jayjay23
Boggersbelief
Angry Dad
WhiteBic
Sgt. Bash
summercummings
Bernard Dennis Park
Reebok Trotter
bwfc71
Natasha Whittam
17 posters

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Go down  Message [Page 3 of 6]

41Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Fri Nov 30 2012, 20:57

Lyric Todkill

Lyric Todkill
Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly

Natasha Whittam wrote:Firstly, before you all get your oversized y-fronts in a twist, let me make it clear I am not homophobic in the slightest, far from it.

However, it has been announced this week that 1 in 20 gay men has HIV. Of the 6000 people diagnosed with HIV in the UK last year, 50% were gay men. Amazing when you consider gay men only make up around 3% of the population.

A small number of those gay men will be bisexual and opening having sex with women. We are close to another HIV epidemic. One that could potentially wipe mankind out inside 100 years.

This isn't just gay men at risk, it's every single one of us. So isn't it time we took steps to stop this? It isn't politically correct, but it's time to outlaw gay sex in the UK. It might not be fair, but surely we have to save mankind by any means necessary?

What do you think?


It is very sad

42Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Fri Nov 30 2012, 21:34

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Lt. Boon wrote:
I intend to be dead within the next 100 years anyway, after that I couldn't give a stuff about the future of mankind.

That's actually quite pathetic, but sadly a view shared by the majority. Do you not have kids? Do you not want them to grow up in a disease free world?

43Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sat Dec 01 2012, 10:28

bwfc71

bwfc71
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Lets put a bit of perspective onto this thread with looking at other STD's

Chancroid - a major cause of genital ulceration in developing countries characterized by painful sores on the genitalia. Another early symptom is dark or light green shears in excrement. Chancroid starts as an erythematous papular lesion that breaks down into a painful bleeding ulcer with a necrotic base and ragged edge. Over 150,000 infected in the UK (2010)

Chlamydia - If untreated, chlamydial infections can cause serious reproductive and other health problems with both short-term and long-term consequences. Chlamydia infection is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections worldwide - more than 1 million people infected in teh UK (2010)

Granuloma - The disease often goes untreated because of the scarcity of medical treatment in the countries in which it is found. In addition, the painless genital ulcers can be mistaken for syphilis. The ulcers ultimately progress to destruction of internal and external tissue, with extensive leakage of mucus and blood from the highly vascular lesions. The destructive nature of donovanosis also increases the risk of superinfection by other pathogenic microbes.

Gonorrhea - In both men and women if gonorrhea is left untreated, it may spread locally causing epididymitis or pelvic inflammatory disease or throughout the body, affecting joints and heart valves. WHO estimates that 62 million cases of gonorrhea appear each year, worldwide! (In the United Kingdom 196 per 100,000 males 20 to 24 years old, and 133 per 100,000 females 16 to 19 years old were diagnosed in 2005)

Syphilis - The signs and symptoms of syphilis vary depending in which of the four stages it presents (primary, secondary, latent, and tertiary). The primary stage classically presents with a single chancre (a firm, painless, non-itchy skin ulceration), secondary syphilis with a diffuse rash which frequently involves the palms of the hands and soles of the feet, latent syphilis with little to no symptoms, and tertiary syphilis with gummas, neurological, or cardiac symptoms. It has, however, been known as "the great imitator" due to its frequent atypical presentations. Worldwide there are estimates that about 18 million are affected each year (2010)

Herpes - Genital herpes, known simply as herpes, is the second most common form of herpes. Other disorders such as herpetic whitlow, herpes gladiatorum, ocular herpes, cerebral herpes infection encephalitis, Mollaret's meningitis, neonatal herpes, and possiblyAlzheimers and Bell's Palsy are all caused by herpes simplex viruses. Over a million people infected in the UK (2008)

Crabs - They feed exclusively on blood. Humans are the only known hosts of this parasite, although a closely related species, Pthirus gorillae, infects gorilla populations. The species passed to humans 3.3 million years ago. Over 3 million, in the UK, are infected each year (2007)

Thus put into perspective HIV/AIDS is not much of a threat compared to the other main STD's - also do not forget that at one point in history the other STD's also killed human life, so nothing new and nothing to be frightened of! Just be educated, be safe and play safe!

44Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sat Dec 01 2012, 10:44

Bernard Dennis Park

Bernard Dennis Park
El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf

bwfc71 wrote:Thus put into perspective HIV/AIDS is not much of a threat compared to the other main STD's

Utter nonsense.

45Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sat Dec 01 2012, 11:27

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

bwfc71 wrote:
Thus put into perspective HIV/AIDS is not much of a threat compared to the other main STD's

Tell that to Eazy E. You should apologise for your disgraceful comments.

46Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sat Dec 01 2012, 11:38

Soul Kitchen

Soul Kitchen
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

WhiteBic wrote:Don't get me wrong as I do have a few gay friends. But putting your manhood up where you poo from? It is a bit wrong.

Depends on your state of mind really. Personally I have enough problems with my chocolate starfish after a night on handpump ale without having a pork sword shoved init!

If we were all wankers then problem solved!!

47Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sat Dec 01 2012, 11:47

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

I am seething that this thread isn't being taken seriously.

48Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sat Dec 01 2012, 12:37

Lyric Todkill

Lyric Todkill
Tony Kelly
Tony Kelly

Who do you ban in Africa?

Most of AIDS there isn't gay men.

49Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sat Dec 01 2012, 12:59

Guest


Guest

bwfc71 wrote:Lets put a bit of perspective onto this thread with looking at other STD's

Chancroid
Chlamydia
Granuloma
Gonorrhea
Syphilis
Herpes
Crabs

Did you have them all at once or individually?

50Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sat Dec 01 2012, 21:25

bwfc71

bwfc71
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Natasha Whittam wrote:
Tell that to Eazy E. You should apologise for your disgraceful comments.

:bullshit:

Its about time you learned teh true facts rather than pretending to be The Daily Mail and trying to create scare-threads.

In fact you are just as bad a Rupert Murdoch with your factually incorrect shite!!!

Fact is it is only 96,000 people infected with HIV out of 65 million people. Of that 96,000 there are possibly about 24,000 of them not knowing they have the infection. So what are the chances of someone catching off those that don't know? (ans: 0.039%) You have more of a chance of being struck by lightening!!! In fact there is more of a chance of bwfcDave of getting pregnant than of being infected by HIV!

As I say its about education of being safe, rather than playing Russian Roulette!

51Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sun Dec 02 2012, 01:24

Sgt. Bash

Sgt. Bash
Andy Walker
Andy Walker

Natasha Whittam wrote:Do you not have kids?

I do not have children (or HIV), as I use protection. Unlike a certain troll from Blackburn who has sired half of Rovers inbred chavvy fanbase!

52Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sun Dec 02 2012, 09:13

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

bwfc71 wrote:
Its about time you learned teh true facts rather than pretending to be The Daily Mail and trying to create scare-threads.

In fact you are just as bad a Rupert Murdoch with your factually incorrect shite!!!

Fact is it is only 96,000 people infected with HIV out of 65 million people. Of that 96,000 there are possibly about 24,000 of them not knowing they have the infection. So what are the chances of someone catching off those that don't know? (ans: 0.039%) You have more of a chance of being struck by lightening!!! In fact there is more of a chance of bwfcDave of getting pregnant than of being infected by HIV!

As I say its about education of being safe, rather than playing Russian Roulette!

Let me get this straight, you think there's more chance of a bloke getting pregnant than catching HIV?

And that's why we should all be very scared. You are clearly an educated guy with a good job yet you can't see the dangers of unprotected sex with Dutch men.

53Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sun Dec 02 2012, 10:48

Bernard Dennis Park

Bernard Dennis Park
El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf

bwfc71 wrote: In fact there is more of a chance of bwfcDave of getting pregnant than of being infected by HIV!

Hahaha you are fucking mental. You come out with figures and percentages as part of your argument and then go and say something bizarre like that.

It's DaveBWFC btw.

54Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sun Dec 02 2012, 12:07

bwfc71

bwfc71
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Natasha Whittam wrote:
bwfc71 wrote:
Its about time you learned teh true facts rather than pretending to be The Daily Mail and trying to create scare-threads.

In fact you are just as bad a Rupert Murdoch with your factually incorrect shite!!!

Fact is it is only 96,000 people infected with HIV out of 65 million people. Of that 96,000 there are possibly about 24,000 of them not knowing they have the infection. So what are the chances of someone catching off those that don't know? (ans: 0.039%) You have more of a chance of being struck by lightening!!! In fact there is more of a chance of bwfcDave of getting pregnant than of being infected by HIV!

As I say its about education of being safe, rather than playing Russian Roulette!

Let me get this straight, you think there's more chance of a bloke getting pregnant than catching HIV?

And that's why we should all be very scared. You are clearly an educated guy with a good job yet you can't see the dangers of unprotected sex with Dutch men.



Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 3018290685

55Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sun Dec 02 2012, 12:08

bwfc71

bwfc71
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Bernard Dennis Park wrote:
bwfc71 wrote: In fact there is more of a chance of bwfcDave of getting pregnant than of being infected by HIV!

Hahaha you are fucking mental. You come out with figures and percentages as part of your argument and then go and say something bizarre like that.

It's DaveBWFC btw.



Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 3018290685

56Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sun Dec 02 2012, 12:37

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

As usual Amos it's difficult to take anything you say seriously.

Are you standing by your comment that a man is more likely to get pregnant than catch HIV from gay sex?

57Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sun Dec 02 2012, 16:06

Bernard Dennis Park

Bernard Dennis Park
El Hadji Diouf
El Hadji Diouf

I think his Dad was locked up when he should've been explaining the birds and the beas to Christopher. You can't blame the nutter for not knowing where babies come from.

58Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sun Dec 02 2012, 16:12

Natasha Whittam

Natasha Whittam
Nat Lofthouse
Nat Lofthouse

Bernard Dennis Park wrote:I think his Dad was locked up when he should've been explaining the birds and the beas to Christopher. You can't blame the nutter for not knowing where babies come from.

If his Dad was in prison he should be a bloody expert on gay sex.

59Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sun Dec 02 2012, 16:55

bwfc71

bwfc71
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Natasha Whittam wrote:As usual Amos it's difficult to take anything you say seriously.

Are you standing by your comment that a man is more likely to get pregnant than catch HIV from gay sex?



Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 3018290685

60Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 Empty Re: Time To Ban The Gays? Sun Dec 02 2012, 16:56

bwfc71

bwfc71
Ivan Campo
Ivan Campo

Bernard Dennis Park wrote:I think his Dad was locked up when he should've been explaining the birds and the beas to Christopher. You can't blame the nutter for not knowing where babies come from.



Time To Ban The Gays? - Page 3 3018290685

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 3 of 6]

Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum