Home
jussi22 wrote:O my God, i'll apologize again, Breadman i apologize for calling you names and upsetting you.
Do you accept my apology, Breadman?
If I thought for one minute that was a genuine apology, I'd accept it.
But it's clearly not, is it?
That's the sort of apology teenage girls offer up when their Dad's said "You can go out with your friends on Friday night if you apologise for generally being a stroppy twat for the last week and making everybody's lives miserable with your hormonal bollocks."
So as it is, you can shove it up your shitter.
And I know this is playing right into Sluffy's hands because he can now add "Scott apologised but Bread wouldn't accept it" to the list of lies he's using to defend his position regarding this mess, but fuck it, it's not like anything I post on this subject gets quoted accurately, is it, so what the hell.....
Scott, if you can offer a genuine apology wherein you properly acknowledge what you did wrong and you come across as being genuinely contrite, I will accept it.
But I'm obviously biased, so my judgment may be clouded so we need Sluffy or one of the other mods to start a thread with a poll on it where people can indicate whether or not they think Scott's being genuine.
And I will honestly abide by its findings.
If the results indicate that the consensus view is that Scott's being genuine, I promise I'll shut my yap and we can all move on as though nothing ever happened.
Honest injun.
Let the great people of Nuts decide.
How's that for democratic process in action?
Seems fair enough to me.
Last edited by Breadman on Tue Dec 30 2014, 16:18; edited 1 time in total
i could never slag you off RT, Liam Trotter on the other hand....
