Sorry, but that's all very vague, full of flim flam and filler and wastes time answering questions no one's asked.
And it's full of "politician speak" like the answer which purports to address the issue of members of the Steering Group standing (or not) for election.
Initially it was an unequivocal "No" but that's morphed into "some of us have said they aren't interested but you'd have to contact the members individually and ask them".
It's all bollocks and you can call me a conspiracy theorist if you like but I'm 46 and have made a career out of wading through bullshit to get the truth so I can try and sort it and everything concerned with this trust is coming across as bollocks to me.
And it's full of "politician speak" like the answer which purports to address the issue of members of the Steering Group standing (or not) for election.
Initially it was an unequivocal "No" but that's morphed into "some of us have said they aren't interested but you'd have to contact the members individually and ask them".
It's all bollocks and you can call me a conspiracy theorist if you like but I'm 46 and have made a career out of wading through bullshit to get the truth so I can try and sort it and everything concerned with this trust is coming across as bollocks to me.